Pittsburgh Rys 101
Robert E. Rathke
brathke at juno.com
Tue Jul 13 21:50:27 EDT 1999
If I may step aside from the ongoing discussion for a moment...
In 1964, one of PAT's arguments for a single transit system in Allegheny
County was that it would eliminate the visual confusion of the 2-1/2
dozen paint schemes of the former provate transit companies, and replace
them with one unified paint scheme (PAT's). After the Mod Desire car and
numerous two-color variations of PAT's vertical paint scheme in the early
1970's, I always thought it was ironic that the system was reverting to
the pre-1964 street scene.
Bob Rathke 7/13
On Tue, 13 Jul 1999 11:50:51 -0700 Jim Holland <pghpcc at pacbell.net>
writes:
>Greetings!
>
>EDWARD H. LYBARGER wrote:
>>
>> I would agree with everything Ken wrote!
>
>> But the ultimate point is that we can't call people "evil" simply
>for
>> eliminating streetcars!
>
>Ken Josephson responded:
>
>> > No, but we can call them abusive IF the public funding their
>operation
>> > are ridiculed for opposing their plans or are intimidated into
>accepting
>> > what the public agency claims IT wants for the public rather than
>what
>> > the public wants from it. Ken J.
>
>Jim Holland originally wrote:
>
>> 10) Was Geissenheimer responsible for the bizarre paint schemes in
>the
>> 1970's?
>
> Believe so! At first I wasn't too keen about the change but
>it did
>bring about a positive public image - many riders knew the cars by
>name and
>number!
> The ({[PAT gray]}) paint scheme is symbolic of everything evil
>in PAT
>and is akin to *devil red* as far as I am concerned.
>
> And when taken to task about **"everything evil in PAT"** - I
>explained the same
>things that Kenny explained - the things that Ed agrees with - that
>the methods used by
>PAT were underhanded. Ed twisted the statement **"everything evil in
>PAT"** into
>**"eliminating streetcars."**. The latter was the end result of
>({[PAT's]}) evil
>actions. I have acknowledged ALL ALONG DURING THIS DISCUSSION
>that streetcars have
>seen their day and are now taking their place in history - I have
>acknowledged all along
>that the end for streetcars is here. But I DO NOT LIKE THE EVIL
> METHODS
>({[PAT]}) USED TO ACHIEVE THIS END.
>
>Ed Lybarger has also said::
>> No one holds a monopoly on abuse of power.
>
> Therefore, I can assume that ({[PAT]}) abused power as well
>(evil).
> I can also assume that -- since what I personally said is
>the same that Ken
>Josephson said -- Ed also agrees with what I said -- even though
>he can't say so
>directly!
>
>--
>James B. Holland
> To e-mail *off-list,* please click here:
>mailto:pghpcc at pacbell.net
> PITTSBURGH RAILWAYS COMPANY (PRCo), June of 1949 -- June
>of 1953
> Pennsylvania Trolley Museum (PTM) member #273;
>http://www.pa-trolley.org/
>N.M.R.A. Life member #2190; http://www.mcs.net:80/~weyand/nmra/
___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list