Signalling -- SHJ
Jim Holland
pghpcc at pacbell.net
Fri Dec 1 22:05:30 EST 2000
Greetings!
Fred W. Schneider III wrote:
> Was this a weight limit or simply spacing signals to prevent accidents
> in the event of a fog?
> The same signals went all the way down through South Hills yard and
> there wasn't a weight problem there.
You know what amazes me - South Hills Jct. under PRCo had a myriad of
turnouts, routes, turns, crossings, and the only signalling was at the
mouth of the tunnel!
In one of the videos on ({[pat]}) probably not too long before the
rebuilding of SHJ, the cameraman is standing near the old 40-line
turnout filming toward the north. An outbound interurban crosses the
scene, followed by an outbound 42/38 followed by a car crossing all this
outbound from behind the admin building followed by other cars crossing
inbound. This is not a series of shots or cuts to make a scene -- it
is all naturally flowing movement.
With the modern computer controlled systems of today that preset
turnouts and control blocks etc., SHJ would be a nightmare of delays
with the track layout from old PRCo days - nothing would get through!
But it all worked so smoothly under PRCo with only a bare minimum of
delay.
James B. Holland
Pittsburgh Railways Company (PRCo), 1930 -- 1950
To e-mail privately, please click here: mailto:pghpcc at pacbell.net
N.M.R.A. Life member #2190; http://www.mcs.net:80/~weyand/nmra/
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list