Carhouses, Dave's, Etc./Boeing Vertol and M11
Kenneth and Tracie Josephson
kjosephson at sprintmail.com
Sat Jul 8 03:45:54 EDT 2000
>
> > Just as we are criticizing the Pittsburgh area railfans of the early 1960s
> > concerning M11, as a railfan living in California, so to will you be
> > chastised (collectively with all other middle age and older railfans) as
> > being short-sighted for your failure to help save a Boeing-Vertol car at the
> > Rio Vista trolley museum.
> >
> > Is there any difference?
None! Perhaps Seashore will have the foresight to save at least one MBTA Boeing-Vertol
car.
As over-engineered and troublesome as these cars were (funny how no one ever hears any
complaints about CTA's B-V rapid transit cars) they certainly filled a gap between the
PCC era and the modern lightrail era. And their problems have contributed to keeping
the PCC era alive and well in Boston.
One thing some fans don't want to face or discuss is that the (first generation) PCC
era would have ended in North America as the cars wore out, even if the systems they
served had survived as rail operations. Even if PCC production continued through the
1950's and up, the body style would have changed, the technology would have continued
to evolve, etc.
The Boeing-Vertol is not one of my favorite rail vehicles. Not that my emotion driven
railfan opinions matter. That said, I believe the Boeing-Vertol still deserves a place
in the history of traction evolution. So there! :-)
Ken J.
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list