The Government -- Westinghouse vs GE equipment
Kenneth and Tracie Josephson
kjosephson at sprintmail.com
Sat Jun 10 14:04:04 EDT 2000
"Fred W. Schneider III" wrote:
> Why not a 100% fleet from one supplier? There were many of them. Cleveland was all
> Westinghouse. Dallas too. Birmingham also. Cincinnati had one GE car and 76
> Westinghouse units. Illinois Terminal was all GE. Johnstown all Westinghouse. All
> of the wartime LA cars were GE but the prewar P class and the postwar P3s were
> Westinghouse. Louisville was all Westinghouse. Pacific Electric's 30 cars came from
> Westinghouse. San Diego's two orders were 100 percent Westinghouse. Shaker Heights
> liked GE cars ... only the used Toronto cars were Westinghouse. In Canada, GE
> couldn't even get the toe-nail off the smallest toe in the door ... Canadian
> Westinghouse captured the entire market.
Wow! That answers my question. Thanks. I guess I should pull out my copies of your books
and re-read them. It's been years since I have.
So a company could order the cars equipped as they wanted them. Perhaps the reason
Pittsburgh went with the 75-25 split will resurface. Ken J.
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list