SAND ON RAILS and SIGNAL PROBLEMS
Fred W. Schneider III
fschnei at supernet.com
Fri Nov 10 16:50:45 EST 2000
I very vaguely remember that track brake switch. Do you remember which cars? Were
they used on seven days a week in preference to other cars?
Jim Holland wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> You didn't miss the original message -- it wasn't posted here!
>
> And the IT messages were on another list as well, not here.
>
> The subject of electrical conductivity with models came up on a list
> which discusses models and I relayed information that showed that the
> prototype had conductivity problems as well!
>
> I thus mentioned PRCo and the prohibition on sanding on the interurbans
> unless an emergency. Also saw an accident with lrvs in SF where track
> circuits are used to set turnouts. An operator sanded the rails and set
> the turnout correctly but the sand broke the contact and a following
> truck threw the turnout which caused the rear end of that train to smash
> into the one beside it and derail.
>
> Some of the PRCo 1700-series interurbans had a switch on the dash to
> set the trackbrake so it would scrape along the rail and clear it of
> sand!
>
> Fred W. Schneider III wrote:
>
> > BECAUSE THE SUBJECT LINE WAS NEVER CHANGED
> > FROM PHILADELPHIA PCC RETRIEVER ON
> > SALE ON EBAY, I PROBABLY DELETED
> > THE INITIAL MESSAGE IN THIS SEQUENCE. I'VE
> > ELIMINATED A LOT OF MESSAGES LATELY
> > ABOUT E-BAY AND ILLINOIS TERMINAL ENGINES
> > WITHOUT EVEN OPENING THEM.
>
> James B. Holland
>
> Pittsburgh Railways Company (PRCo), 1930 -- 1950
> To e-mail privately, please click here: mailto:pghpcc at pacbell.net
> N.M.R.A. Life member #2190; http://www.mcs.net:80/~weyand/nmra/
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list