Pittsburgh Railways PCCs/Toronto PCCs

[Kenneth Josephson]

"Edward H. Lybarger" wrote:

> 1799 2nd was 1613, not 1640, according to some of the shop people at the
> time of the rebuild.  We have carried it as such at PTM, but I can't tell
> you absolutely which was which.

Let's not forget that 1613 once carried a pilot. There should be evidence of
the pilot mounting  (holes, bracing) under the front. 1640 was a city car its
entire life. Wouldn't a careful inspection underneath show whether or not the
car is really 1613 or 1640? What about evidence within the car (opening rear
window, luggage rack mounting location) or evidence of the spare trolley pole
mounting or horn?

Ken J.