[PRCo] WP -- TV
Jim Holland
pghpcc at pacbell.net
Mon Apr 16 00:30:11 EDT 2001
How about???????-------
THANKS for taking the time to share-------
As opposed to-------
"Thanks for Listening!"(:->)
Your comments certainly share some extremely valuable insight into
conditions in the very early 1950s!
So the original PERC writers seem to be indicating that
*TV--was--the--final--nail* in the coffin for WP -- not the sole
reason for abaondonment -- far from it!
> Harold Geissenheimer wrote:
> Greetings to every one
> Now about the TV. In the late l940's and early 1950's several important
> things affected transit ridership. One was the 5 day week replacing the 5
> 1/2
> work on Saturday week. Two was TV. It hit the movie business very
> hard. Three was the automobile. Four was the closing of mines and mills.
> Five was the shift to shopping centers from the many downtowns. You
> had to see how crowded these downtowns were on Saturday and suddenly
> they were empty
> The Fayette Coach Co (owned by Lincoln Coach of Irwin) took over
> the main WestPenn routes but abandoned them shortly after. One thing
> they found out was that rail passengers boarded at isolated car stops away
> from the highway. Bus passengers were standing along the highway and were
> frequently given a ride.
> I know from my own experience that the TV and Saturday thing affected
> local bus lines in Tarentum and New Kensington. Also in Oil City, the
> Citizens Transit (ex Citizens Traction) purchased 5 new diesel buses in
> 1950
> and quit shortly thereafter. Citizens was owned by the same owners as
> Montour Motor Coach in Pgh where I first worked in the transit business.
> I once worked a one week vacation replacement in Oil City in 1950.
> These were hard years in Western Pennsylvania. I know. I was there.
> Remember this about the TV replacing the movie. People who went to the
> movie by transit made an extra round trip. That was almost profit. Now
> they stayed home. Pittsburgh was similarly affected as the downtown movie
> business dropped. Thats why the Penn and Stanley movies are now stage
> shows.
> Thanks for listening. Best wishes.
> Harold Geissenheimer
>> ROGER Jenkins wrote:
>> Well Fred if two publications said it was TV that reduced the riding on
>> West Penn and you did not believe it, what do you think the real reason
>> was? To me it sounded plausible that the draw of watching Ed Sullivan
>> and a whole lot of other things on the 12 inch sets like my neihbor had
>> where us kids went to watch it, made perfect sense. Instead of riding
>> the trolley to the local bijou , people stayed home glued to that new
>> fangled picture box !
--
James B. Holland
Pittsburgh Railways Company (PRCo), 1930 -- 1950
To e-mail privately, please click here: mailto:pghpcc at pacbell.net
N.M.R.A. Life member #2190; http://www.mcs.net:80/~weyand/nmra/
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list