Clipping
Derrick J Brashear
shadow at dementia.org
Tue Feb 27 13:56:12 EST 2001
--On Tuesday, February 27, 2001 10:43:04 AM -0800 Kenneth Josephson
<kjosephson at sprintmail.com> wrote:
> Few people thought the automobile, perfected or not, would ever become
> widely available to the masses. Few planners envisioned suburbs beyond
> the final reach of the carlines. No one really imagined the "superfarms"
> we know of today. The distinction between rural and urban was still
> relatively black & white. So it was easy for outsiders and even a few
> insiders to imagine nothing displacing the streetcar or interurban at
> the turn of the century
Well, I dunno. Has it happened as much here as elsewhere? We have
Monroeville, Cranberry, Peters Township, North Huntingdon, Hempfield, North
Fayette. But of those... Cranberry was at least partially served by
electric rail service, as were North Huntingdon, Peters and Hempfield
(parts of it, anyhow). Only Monroeville and North Fayette had no service
(actually, that's not strictly true, since the 62 Trafford served the
portion of Patton Township along Turtle Creek, but most people forget
that's Monroeville)
But one could also argue the development around Pittsburgh doesn't fit the
national norm. And in fact most of the rail lines, electric and otherwise,
served corridors along creek and river valleys, which also happened to be
where people lived and worked at least early on.
There was a lot of private right of way in the more rural systems (Harmony
and West Penn) and one wonders if those lines had survived longer if any of
that could have been usefully adapted to still be a transportation
corridor. Most of the West Penn was adequately built for what it did, and
certainly no further expense was justified at the time, making most of it
unlikely to be usefully reused. Likewise I suspect the corridor which ran
to Cranberry would likewise be too underbuilt for today's standards. On the
other hand, what if instead of the West Busway something could have been
done with the extensive private right of way which existed from the West
End services, and then perhaps tied into the former Panhandle right of way
outbound of the tunnel?
It's all pointless speculation, since the way things evolved in this
country basically precluded survival of the more rural systems and made the
preservation of urban systems require great foresight and potentially
greater expense. It's still annoying to me, though, that the system we're
left with here isn't more useful than it is
-D
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list