Clipping

Kenneth Josephson kjosephson at sprintmail.com
Tue Feb 27 15:26:25 EST 2001



Derrick J Brashear wrote:

> Sharing rail rights of way isn't as simple as that, especially in this day
> of lawsuits. Look at what happened after (Ricky?) Gates ran that Conrail
> train into the path of a Northeast Corridor passenger train... These days
> it's all about having exclusive use of your tracks, and while maybe earlier
> that would not have been the case I can't see that until around 1965 things
> would have been suitable to that, and probably not even then. The Pennsy
> quit their commuter service in... 1963 I think and I can't see why they'd
> want PAT on their rails after that. If they did it would be "give us money,
> let us run trains". And they didn't even seem to be overly enthused with
> that!

True. But it has worked in San Diego. Plus there is a PAT busway along a
railroad corridor on the East End. The tracks there have been reduced from three
or four down to one. You are correct, litigation has ruined everything.

Ken J.




More information about the Pittsburgh-railways mailing list