1713 and PAT Snow Removal

[Edward H. Lybarger]

I was being facetious.  Actually, there are some blades attached under a
handful of 4100s.  I'm not sure how well they work, but suppose they'd be OK
under constant service in a storm.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
[mailto:owner-pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org]On Behalf Of Edward H.
Lybarger
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 9:46 AM
To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
Subject: RE: 1713 and PAT Snow Removal


The sun.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
[mailto:owner-pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org]On Behalf Of Kenneth
Josephson
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 2:49 AM
To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
Subject: Re: 1713 and PAT Snow Removal




Charles Brown wrote:

> 1765 should've rang a bell with me since we depleted Ray's gong
> collection. :-)

No we didn't! He's as bad as you, me and Sean. You can never have enough
trolley parts. :-)

I suppose there wouldn't be much demand for broad gauge work cars. Which
leads
to this topic related question:

What does PAT use these days to remove snow from its rights of ways?

Ken J.