[PRCo] Re: Interesting Items on eBay (grande finale)

[Harold Geissenheimer]

Greetings to all

While I dont use E-Bay and probably wont, I enjoyed John's listings.

I JOIN BOB TO VOTE TO KEEP JOHN'S LISTINGS.

Harold Geissenheimer


"Dietrich, Robert J." wrote:

> I don't usually get into these discussions but here goes.
>
> John says he was asked to stop clicking on the mail-this-item button on
> E-Bay.  Was that from someone on this list?  If so then my vote is "John
> keep clicking".  Most of the items John shows us are relevant to the whims
> of this list, at least as relevant as topics introduced by other list
> members.  I'll admit that I don't care about some of those E-Bay items but
> that is what the delete key is for.  I would like to make one suggestion, if
> it is possible John put a word or two about the subject in the title.
>
> Some of the discussions that follow John's postings tend to drift away from
> the stated course of the list but that is no reason to stop the posting of
> the original message.
>
> Someone suggested we could  search E-Bay for the things we are interested
> in.  Not me.  I don't have the time or inclination to add another time
> robber to my life.  I really do like to be surprised once in awhile, though,
> with a good West Penn or PRCo picture that can be mine for $25.00  or free.
>
> This is a most interesting group and we shouldn't thwart the free exchange
> of ideas, information, opinions, and pictures.
>
> Thanks for listening.
>
> Bob
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   Derrick J Brashear [mailto:shadow at dementia.org]
> Sent:   Wednesday, June 06, 2001 4:07 PM
> To:     pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
> Subject:        [PRCo] Re: Interesting Items on eBay (grande finale)
>
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2001 tompark at interchange.ubc.ca wrote:
>
> >
> > I find John's extracts of Pittsburgh relevant material from ebay
> interesting and valuable.
> > Why should he not keep posting these to the PRCo list?
>
> No Pittsburgh-relevant material is ever inappropriate for this list. I've
> never meant to imply otherwise.
>
> -D