[PRCo] Re: 46--line vs 49--line

[John F Bromley]

Mine's from the descriptive guides (Lewis 1926, PRC 1936 and 38).  I think
that's a consensus.  Maps are often ambiguous when they lay carlines over
streets.  I mean, how m,any times can they reproduce a number beside a black
line (or whatever color).  Sooner or later there's going to be a problem
unless a loop is clearly shown.  I don't say I'm right, I just say that's
what's in b/w.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Donald Galt" <galtfd at att.net>
To: <pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org>
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 6:59 PM
Subject: [PRCo] Re: 46--line vs 49--line


>
> On 8 Jun 01, at 15:52, Donald Galt wrote:
>
> >
> > My 193x map shows the 46 continuing along Arlington Avenue to
> > Mount Oliver. No definite indication as to where it reversed, but it
> > is shown (along with 47 and 48) along the stretch of Arlington between
> > Warrington and S. 18th, but nowhere beyond.
> >
>
> I see this conflicts with the information posted by John Bromley.
> Ah, well!
>
> Don
>