[PRCo] Re: Apology

[Jim Holland]

HI!

ED::	Most of the posts I made were informational without a need for
reply; thought others  *might*  be interested.  Additionally, I Never
expect a reply - that way I can't be disappointed!
	Because you have a repository of information at your fingertips, you
may feel obligated to answer.  While we might hope for this, we really
don't expect it.  We recognize you have responsibilities above and
beyond the list.  But Many Thanks for all your input when you have the
time.

	But I must confess to being miffed for being called on the carpet by
name for posting  ON--Topic  material  --  and after being chastised for
such there were several messages Totally OFF--Topic  --  not even
trolleycars!   And there are those who call me  List--Policeman  because
a year ago I objected to  OFF--Topic conversation.  It seems that 
OFF--Topic  material is preferred over  ON--Topic!

	Not all aspects of PRCo interest each and every One of us so we just
have to Grin And Bear It on some discussions  --  at least they are 
ON--Topic!

KEN::	You couldn't have had 120--messages to delete.  I personally never
posted anywhere near that and You and I were talking back and forth
on-list about Midnight Sunday near the end of the postings!<GGG>

> John Swindler wrote:

> And since I was taken to task some six months ago for changing the subject
> line by someone else on this list, I don't.

>> From: Kenneth Josephson <kjosephson at sprintmail.com>

>> Well, I for one, will apologize. I could have taken my six or seven
>> questions and sent one e-mail listing them.
>> I will try to watch it from now on.

>> I wish to add many of us (me included) have been very lazy
>> about changing the subject line. When I deleted the 120
>> or so messages, I had to wonder how many were
>> already on a new topic I would have enjoyed reading.

-- 
Jim