[PRCo] Re: Brookline via Overbrook

Fred Schneider fschnei at supernet.com
Sun Apr 28 08:43:28 EDT 2002


Reply - depends on the year.  I've seen a lot of 3750s, I've probably
also seen most of anything that was at Tunnel.

tsquare wrote:

> What was the route number.
>
> Was this part of the Interurban Division (i.e., were 3750's
> used or standard city low-floors -- single- or double-end)?
>
> Tom






More information about the Pittsburgh-railways mailing list