[PRCo] Re: About Car 1630
Jim Holland
pghpcc at pacbell.net
Sun Mar 31 21:43:08 EST 2002
Good Morning!
> Kenneth Josephson wrote:
> Sometimes I wonder if PAT would have rejected the 1630 had Pittsburgh Railways
> installed roof vent/cowl from a retired 1200 or 1400 instead of the older style type
> from a 1000 or 1100.
A 1200 trolley cowling was distinctly different from all the others
--- it retains the old 100, 1000--1199 cowling and adds the 14, 15, 16
type in front with a transition piece from one to the other.
Have wondered the same.
> Were there other "give-aways" that this car was an "oddball" after PRwys removed the
> large roof ventilator?
Not that I can think of.
The rejection of 1630 emphasizes ({[pats]}) abandon trolleycars
philosophy because the overhaul was not just cosmetic - she also received
mechanical and electrical tune-up! She was a stellar performer and should
have been kept.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
James B. Holland
Holland Electric Railway Operation.......
___"O"--Scale St.-Petersburg Trams Company Trolleycars and...
______"O"--Scale Parts mailto:pghpcc at pacbell.net
______Pennsylvania Trolley Museum http://www.pa-trolley.org/
___Pittsburgh Railways Company (PRCo), 1930 -- 1950
N.M.R.A. Life member #2190; http://www.nmra.org
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list