[PRCo] Re: About Car 1630

Jim Holland pghpcc at pacbell.net
Sun Mar 31 21:43:08 EST 2002


Good Morning!

> Kenneth Josephson wrote:

> Sometimes I wonder if PAT would have rejected the 1630 had Pittsburgh Railways
> installed roof vent/cowl from a retired 1200 or 1400 instead of the older style type
> from a 1000 or 1100.

	A 1200 trolley cowling was distinctly different from all the others  
---   it retains the old 100, 1000--1199 cowling and adds the 14, 15, 16
type in front with a transition piece from one to the other.
	Have wondered the same.

> Were there other "give-aways" that this car was an "oddball" after PRwys removed the
> large roof ventilator?

	Not that I can think of.

	The rejection of 1630 emphasizes  ({[pats]})  abandon trolleycars
philosophy because the overhaul was not just cosmetic - she also received
mechanical and electrical tune-up!   She was a stellar performer and should
have been kept.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

James B. Holland

Holland  Electric  Railway  Operation....... 
___"O"--Scale St.-Petersburg Trams Company Trolleycars and...
______"O"--Scale  Parts  mailto:pghpcc at pacbell.net

______Pennsylvania Trolley Museum http://www.pa-trolley.org/
___Pittsburgh  Railways  Company  (PRCo),   1930  --  1950
N.M.R.A.  Life member #2190; http://www.nmra.org

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>




More information about the Pittsburgh-railways mailing list