[PRCo] Re: rails still in Penn Av

[Fred Schneider]

Sorry Ed and all of you ... my head said PaPUC and the fingers typed ICC.
Agreed, we all know that Pittsburgh Railways was not involved in interstate
commerce and was therefore not uder the review of the ICC.

"Edward H. Lybarger" wrote:

> The ICC had nothing to do with PAT or PRCo.
>
> PAT removed rail only if it was politically expeditious (or required by a
> lawsuit), not because PUC had any authority to make them do it.  Perhaps HHG
> could clarify what really went on.  I may indeed have oversimplified it.
>
> See you all (figuratively) June 17!
>
> Ed
-- Trailing quotes stripped by Listar --