[PRCo] Re: Latrobe (Greensburg Picture)

Edward H. Lybarger twg at pulsenet.com
Sun Feb 9 20:18:12 EST 2003


East Greensburg was originally a separate borough, merged into Greensburg in
1905.  Underwood Avenue was a prime residential street there, and the
community took its name.

Yes, the TTs in CERA 110 do indicate this as an alternate through
outing  --  Sand House to Ludwick via Terminal.  I wonder what year's
schedules they showed...we have a couple TTs from the 30s in the library and
I'm curious if and when any changes were made.  Perhaps my photos are
earlier than I thought.

Now what are the house numbers in the picture?!

Thanks,
Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org
[mailto:pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org]On Behalf Of
Derrick J Brashear
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 7:58 PM
To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
Subject: [PRCo] Re: Latrobe (Greensburg Picture)



On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Edward H. Lybarger wrote:

>
> So we drove right past it!  Well, I've done that before.  And I can't even
> blame the sun!  But that was the Underwood area and the car is signed

We missed it in the confusion of trying to turn early.

> Ludwick (period).  The regular Underwood dash sign read "Greensburg
> Underwood  Keystone No. 1  Huff-Reamer Ave," (Main line via Hecla

The schedules reproduced in the CERA book show some Ludwick cars as from
"East Greensburg". I don't know what that means, specifically, but that's
as far east in Greensburg as the West Penn ran...

> destinations)  And there is a photo I got from Steve Maguire (perhaps not
> his negative) of a car with a dash sign reading "Ludwick  Greensburg
> Haydenville  County Home  Youngwood  Foxtown," which were Main Street
> (Hunker line) destinations.  So this car in this location is of another
era.
> Interesting.








More information about the Pittsburgh-railways mailing list