[PRCo] Re: Latrobe (Greensburg Picture)
Edward H. Lybarger
twg at pulsenet.com
Sun Feb 9 20:18:12 EST 2003
East Greensburg was originally a separate borough, merged into Greensburg in
1905. Underwood Avenue was a prime residential street there, and the
community took its name.
Yes, the TTs in CERA 110 do indicate this as an alternate through
outing -- Sand House to Ludwick via Terminal. I wonder what year's
schedules they showed...we have a couple TTs from the 30s in the library and
I'm curious if and when any changes were made. Perhaps my photos are
earlier than I thought.
Now what are the house numbers in the picture?!
Thanks,
Ed
-----Original Message-----
From: pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org
[mailto:pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org]On Behalf Of
Derrick J Brashear
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 7:58 PM
To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
Subject: [PRCo] Re: Latrobe (Greensburg Picture)
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Edward H. Lybarger wrote:
>
> So we drove right past it! Well, I've done that before. And I can't even
> blame the sun! But that was the Underwood area and the car is signed
We missed it in the confusion of trying to turn early.
> Ludwick (period). The regular Underwood dash sign read "Greensburg
> Underwood Keystone No. 1 Huff-Reamer Ave," (Main line via Hecla
The schedules reproduced in the CERA book show some Ludwick cars as from
"East Greensburg". I don't know what that means, specifically, but that's
as far east in Greensburg as the West Penn ran...
> destinations) And there is a photo I got from Steve Maguire (perhaps not
> his negative) of a car with a dash sign reading "Ludwick Greensburg
> Haydenville County Home Youngwood Foxtown," which were Main Street
> (Hunker line) destinations. So this car in this location is of another
era.
> Interesting.
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list