[PRCo] Re: Ugly Overhead Construction

[John Swindler]

PAT officials didn't design that overhead.  It was designed by a consultant.

Reminds me of a supervisor in PennDOTs Planning Bureau being asked (more 
years ago then I care to countl) why the Eisenhower Interchange in 
Harrisburg was designed the way it was.  The reply was that it wasn't 
PennDOTs fault because it was designed by a consultant.  It may have been 
Bill Millar who then reminded the supervisor that, while true, that fiasco 
was still approved by PennDOT.

John



>From: Fred Schneider <fschnei at supernet.com>
>Reply-To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
>To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
>Subject: [PRCo] Re: Ugly Overhead Construction
>Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 19:38:28 -0400
>
>Sorry to contradict you Ken, but the over the hill line on Warrington and 
>Arlington is a steel manufacturers best dream.  And catenary wasn't
>needed there ... it was still spend money.
>
>Ken & Tracie wrote:
>

_________________________________________________________________
Instant message during games with MSN Messenger 6.0. Download it now FREE!  
http://msnmessenger-download.com