[PRCo] Re: Changes (Was So you can't get to Pittsburgh?)

[Jim Holland]

Good Morning!



>> Jim Holland wrote:

>>         Ken  --  seems to me that you
>> are deluding yourself!    ({[pat]}) 
>> fought the current lrv tooth and nail
>> and balked strongly against rebuilding
>> Overbrook.    There was nothing but
>> disagreement on the rail system.



> Ken & Tracie wrote:

> Not PAT itself, but other people within
> the community who took on PAT's
> anti-rail stance.



Possibly  --  but you know the old saying:

	"""The Squeakiest Oil Gets Wheeled......."""

Definitely wasn't that so many came together but that a couple
with real clout stepped up and swung their hammers
effectively.    The  'unity'  may seem to be there as many would
write Letters to the Editor  --  but that is all talk and no
action.

	Remember when we were talking // writing here OnList about the
possibility of having an Historic Line along Carson Street?    I
personally said that talk is cheap; if we are Really Interested
in such a thing, then let us organize and begin.

	THE  THREAD  DIED  IMMEDIATELY.......
		NOT  ONE  MORE  POST.

	CASE____CLOSED!!!!:):):)



<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Waiting for a bus is as thrilling as fishing,
    with the similar tantalisation that something,
        sometime, somehow, will turn up. 
            George Courtauld

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

James B. Holland

• Holland  Electric  Railway  Operation....... 
  "O"--Scale St.-Petersburg Trams Company (SPTC)
	Trolleycars and "O"--Scale  Parts
		including Q-Car
	mailto:pghpcc at pacbell.net

• Pennsylvania Trolley Museum
	http://www.pa-trolley.org/
• Pittsburgh  Railways  Company  (PRCo),
	1930  --  1950
• N.M.R.A.  Life member #2190;
	http://www.nmra.org

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>