[PRCo] Re: Rankin Car House
Harold Geissenheimer
transitmgr2 at earthlink.net
Wed Feb 25 20:32:16 EST 2004
Fred and all
Motorman would like to live near thebarn..especially for 3AM runs or
late pull ins.
Also extra board operators wanted to live close
I believe that PRC ran some early 3AM trips on lines to get people to work
Om 2d ave to glenwood or places with out all night service.
Certainly all night service made S Hills a good assignment
Always interesting which employee bid which type of run.
Many of the oldest wanted 3-4AM starts to get home early.
Others wanted them for the opportunity to get extra work
Harmony's most senior bid the extra board because he wanted to work
charters (The famed Sam Bardonna of Bardonna road off of route 8)
Augie at Harmony and Community bid the last out in the AM rush
because he did not like to drive in the snow,
One driver always took 2 weekend days and 3 weekday because
traffic was easier. When wives worked or school considerations also
affected bids.
Ray M and Bob L from Butler picked a afternoon combination where
they could drive together to Tarentum. They had seniority to work mornings
but could not get a good match.
Types of eqipment and time of rush hour trips in Pgh also affected picks.
Many operators study run picks for hours before making a choice.
Harold
in the afternoon.
Fred Schneider wrote:
>Follow up on previous e-mails:
>
>Rankin Bridge collapsed June 26, 1937 and was reopened November 25,
>1937. A sidewalk opened in August.
>
>On July 10, 1937 Rankin Car House closed as an operating facility.
>Routes 55, 60 and 61 were moved to Homewood. Route 59 went to
>Glenwood. Routes 67 and 68 went Craft. The route cards for each route
>began with, "Because of the collapse of the Rankin Bridge, ....."
>
>Unfortunately, we have no information on the factors PRC used in their
>decision to move the routes out of Rankin in 1937, or for the failure to
>return those routes to Rankin later in the same year. Perhaps the
>company had been wanting to close it for sometime and the collapse
>simply made shifting of jobs easier. Apparently the other barns now had
>sufficient capacity for all the routes, and they continued to have
>adequate capacity throughout World War II.
>
>Thirty years earlier most operators would have lived in the neighborhood
>where they worked ... generally within walking distance. Perhaps mostly
>within one-half mile. If you moved men to another division, you might
>have had to move them to a new home. West Penn Railways did that when
>the Iron Bridge Carbarn was closed; the company moved the men to new
>houses at Greensburg or Connellsville. But this was 1937 and most
>families in the state had an automobile (ownership was lower in urban
>areas like Pittsburgh and Philadelphia). Moving men may have been more
>of an annoyance than major problem. My recollection is that most
>carbarns in Pittsburgh did not have an abundance of parking for
>employees. This may not have been a problem at Homewood because there
>would have been five blocks or more of street spaces beside the company
>facility. Glenwood may have had some space in the 1950s but I don't
>know about 1930s. Space was probably at a premium around Craft Avenue
>... certainly the presence of Magee Woman's Hospital next door would
>have put a premium on street space. I would love to see what the rest
>of you are thinking.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list