[PRCo] Re: Fineview___PCCs

[Jim Holland]

Good Morning!


> John F Bromley wrote:

> I sincerely doubt the fantrip theory -
> appears to be a workday - look on P335 - track crew
> laying new rail on Henderson, sincerely doubt it to be a
> weekend.   And Tunnel cars didn't have 21 signs, even
> at the end - they used transplanted Keating cars on
> the north side lines after Keating closed.
> This is too early for that for they sure weren't laying
> new rail on Henderson much after the late 1940s.

	Sounds to be very early on and 1674 was obviously
elsewhere  --  Manchester is a definite possibility.

	Don't have the book yet! :)

	True that most Barns carried destinations only
for that barn  --  overlap on occasions when barns // 
routes overlapped.

	PCC Interurbans carried ONLY interurban routings
for the longest time  --  some (many?) may have entered
({[pat]})  era with only interurban signs!




> John F Bromley wrote:

> The Beal (lack-of) effort shows a view with 1674,
> a WH car, and it doesn't appear to be a fan trip
> so figure THAT one out.

>> Jim Holland wrote:

>>         Did 21-line ever operate out of Manchester?
>> That could explain Westinghouse car.

>> Also, depending upon date, 1674 was based at
>> South Hills  --  late 1950s  --  so could have been
>> a fantrip in disguise! :)




<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Jim

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>