[PRCo] Re: Munhall this Morning
Fred Schneider
fschnei at supernet.com
Fri Oct 22 13:37:37 EDT 2004
$2.50 sounds cheap. Remember that nickel fare in 1900? I know you
don't. But the easiest way to adjust for inflation over the last
hundred years is simply to move the decimal two places .... 5 cents to 5
dollars. Because the load factors are so much lower today, $5.00
simply does not cover it.
Based on a typical fare of over a dollar now and a national farebox
recovery rate of about 30 percent, we are actually paying $5 just for
operating costs. If you want to add in capital costs (new cars, new
buildings, new track, capitalized mid-life overhauls) and the value of
taxes that private companies used to pay and are lost now (about 10
percent in Pennsylvania), I think we are actually paying somewhere under
$10 per passenger today.
You're paying for it in your taxes, you might as well use it.
matt wrote:
>Good memories. Thanks for sharing.
>
>No, honestly, I think that somewhere in the Pittsburgh area a carline might
>be a viable alternative and even a tourist attraction. Some day.
>Gas prices being what they are now, and jeeez, with PAT talking about
>raising the base fare to $2.50 and cutting weekend service...yikes, probably
>not a time to propose anything unusual. But, Lord knows it is working well
>in other cities. The Munhall to Waterfront area is a low speed trip anyway.
>But, it'd probably take an act of God to make it reality.
>
>Gas prices being what they are, and jeeez, with PAT talking about raising
>the base fare to $2.50 and cutting weekend service...yikes. Dreaming
>
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list