[PRCo] Re: Kodachrome film

[Fred Schneider]

Long ago I came to the conclusion that railfans were hampered by the opinions of too many of their friends, and that the best railroad photographs were taken not by railfans but by journalists whom no one had told that 1) people should not be included, 2) that the rods had to be
down, 3) that the doors had to be closed, 4) that only the right side could be photographed, and so forth.  Is the use of Kodachrome just one more example or is it simply that we were burned too many times with the dye longevity of other emulsions?

P. S.  I count people like Philip Hastings, David Plowden,  and Jim Shaughnessy as photo journalists because they earned many a check for their work  and we know that Ted Benson and Winston Link  earned their living that way.  These men are (were) masters (in the biased opinion
of Fred).

Bob Rathke wrote:

> I had a meeting in the Loop today, so I took the Metra train downtown.  On the way back to Union Station, I stopped at Central Camera to buy some slide storage boxes, and I found that they had a large supply of Kodachrome 200 film at $8 per 36-exposure roll, so I stocked up.
> When I was checking out, the clerk said to me, "You take railroad photos, don't you?"  I answered, "Yes, how do you know?"  He said that Central sells most of its Kodachrome film to railroad photographers.
>
> Bob 8/18/05