[PRCo] Re: Maintenance
James B. Holland
PRCoPCC at P-R-Co.com
Sat Dec 3 16:29:38 EST 2005
Fred Schneider wrote:
.
> There is a series of pictures that Pittsburgh Railways took, Jim, to
> show operators the right and wrong ways to do certain tasks such as
> removing broken glass from sash, getting on the roof to restore
> poles, resetting poles, and so forth. We displayed some of them at
> PTM about five years ago.
>
> I don't know when I last saw a Pittsburgh motorman on the roof of a
> car but it was long after 1953.
.
I would have expected that PRCo would allow motormen on the roof in the
1950s but as I said, Never Saw It -- and there were Many Times when
poles were stuck in the overhead on the 42-wye and a trouble truck was
called -- would have been extremely easy for two ops to clear this.
.
.
> Between that series of pictures and today there was a major change in
> what we expect people to do. Then if you got hurt doing a little
> more than necessary, we would have paid the medical bill, thanked
> you, and everything would have been OK. Today we might have a suit
> on our hands. So we tell the man not to do anything for which he is
> not trained and qualified. And then we discipline him for showing
> initiative.
.
Agreed -- and just because photos were provided showing such on
({[pat]}) doesn't mean it was permitted then -- It Just
Happened! We haven't been allowed the whole time I have been with
SF-Muni (30-years) but I have done it many times -- in presence of
Supervisors!
.
.
.
>> Jim__Holland wrote:
>> .
>> Yes And No to change. It may be PRCo that we Were and ARE
>> supposed to talk about but *-What--Ifs-* or
>> *-What--Would--*One*--Do--IF...???-* can cross *-Platforms-* and
>> Ages as well (to use a word!!)
>> .
>> And My Today can be 30-years ago (for personal eggsperience!!!)
>> Additionally, I did a little more Then And Now type comparisons.
>> .
>> I also showed how, by 1953, even PRCo had removed the spare
>> trolleypoles on the Interurbans so it was necessary to call in for a
>> change -- doubt ops were allowed on the roof from that time forward
>> -- Never saw an op on the roof and there were Not A Few
>> trolleypoles in the overhead at the 42-wye -- all the ops stayed
>> on the ground and waited for a truck -- 1950s!!!! What
>> *-I-* would have done is to get ahold of the trolley rope (for a
>> pole jammed in the overhead on a backup move on the 42-wye,) pull
>> the rope so the pole would rest against a live wire and then have the
>> motorman pull the trolleycar forward until the pole could be
>> retrieved from the overhead, placed back on the correct overhead
>> wire, and then the car could move on -- HAVE down that on SF-Muni
>> and it IS applicable to PRCo -- Today And Yesterday!!!
>> .
>> Had an ETI coach go down on me tonight. On my 7.02 trip
>> inbound I was at Post // Powell (Onion--Square) when I got an
>> audible // visual EPU--Temp alarm (Emergency Propulsion Unit
>> Temperature -- Translate -- Emergency Propulsion Battery
>> HOT!!) It came on for a few seconds and then spontaneously
>> reset - did this several times and that was it.
>> .
>> Exactly 2-hours later at The Same Identical Spot I got the same but
>> it was on and reset again multiples of times in 10-minutes then it
>> stopped.
>> .
>> Within 20-min it came on and stayed on -- NOW I Am concerned --
>> only know of one of these batteries actually catching fire and that
>> was during the testing of the demo units. I stopped on Jackson
>> at Fillmore in my bus stop and got out to check the battery
>> compartments -- air temp on both sides (nothing but propulsion
>> battery under the floor behind the rear axle -- sliding tray on
>> both sides of the coach for access to same.) One block behind
>> me the 24-Divis Trolley Coach lays over and a truck pulls from behind
>> it -- Lo And Behold it was My Presidio Shop so I flagged them down
>> and we checked the actual batteries -- air temp but possibly low on
>> water. My line is pull in (pull out also) for a number of
>> lines and along came a pull-in, I switched coaches, and they sent the
>> coach I had back to the barn and it is on hold for inspection
>> Monday. I was delayed about 7-min outbound but this was
>> absorbed by my layover at the terminal and I was back on time inbound.
>> .
>> Because the alarm was steadily sounding and because of a fear of fire
>> and Much More Damage, I would have tied the coach up here and called
>> for help -- had the alarm been intermittent I would have taken it
>> directly to the barn (just 4-blocks from the outer end of my line,)
>> gotten another coach, come back out, and then call Central to let
>> them know -- have done this a multitude of times over the
>> years. Much with TCs can be fixed on the road but if the coach
>> is workable with the defect and since the yard is so close to my line
>> that Much More Time is saved if I work the line and take the coach
>> to the barn and come back out rather than wait for the availability
>> of the road crew to reach me -- they may be on a call somewhere else!
>> .
>> On the demo coach they did a test using the battery up the steepest
>> hill on the system on Sacramento from Montgomery to Snob Hill --
>> the coach made it. They then put it back on the overhead 600
>> and continued to the end of the 1-California line -- trouble truck
>> following -- takes about 1-hour to completely recharge the battery
>> -- FAST! They were coming back in on the 1-Calif when flames shot
>> out from the battery -- good thing the trouble truck was there to
>> spot it -- flames extinguished rather quickly but still fair amount
>> of damage to the battery. Had to have a new one flown in from
>> Germany!
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> .
>
Jim__Holland
I__Like__Ike.......And__PCCs!!
down with pantographs ---- UP___WITH___TROLLEYPOLES!!!!!!!
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list