[PRCo] Re: Anticlimbers

James B. Holland PRCoPCC at P-R-Co.com
Mon Jan 3 02:56:47 EST 2005


The photo of 1600 on pg.100  PCCCar That Fought Back hints at the same 
anticlimber as their is a split in the extra band on top to allow 
dropping the pin for the tow bar.       Or it could just be a recess in 
the upper channel to accommodate the pins as the same is necessary in 
the lower portion to accept the tow bar.

But on PCC 2113 it Definitely appears that there is an extra band in two 
pieces  --  again to accommodate the tow bar.


Now let me beat you to the next question  -- 

How  Many  Ribbits  on  a  PRCo  1700-series  Interurban??????? :-) :-P


Jim__Holland



Boris Cefer wrote:

> Just went through my files and what have found! Cars 1700 to 1724 had 
> stronger anticlimbers (both front and rear) than city cars 1725 to 
> 1799. Any clue why that difference?
> On city cars the anticlimber consisted of 2 pieces of U steel, but 
> interurbans had added a piece of flat steel in the upper U.
> Boris





More information about the Pittsburgh-railways mailing list