[PRCo] Re: Anticlimbers
James B. Holland
PRCoPCC at P-R-Co.com
Mon Jan 3 02:56:47 EST 2005
The photo of 1600 on pg.100 PCCCar That Fought Back hints at the same
anticlimber as their is a split in the extra band on top to allow
dropping the pin for the tow bar. Or it could just be a recess in
the upper channel to accommodate the pins as the same is necessary in
the lower portion to accept the tow bar.
But on PCC 2113 it Definitely appears that there is an extra band in two
pieces -- again to accommodate the tow bar.
Now let me beat you to the next question --
How Many Ribbits on a PRCo 1700-series Interurban??????? :-) :-P
Jim__Holland
Boris Cefer wrote:
> Just went through my files and what have found! Cars 1700 to 1724 had
> stronger anticlimbers (both front and rear) than city cars 1725 to
> 1799. Any clue why that difference?
> On city cars the anticlimber consisted of 2 pieces of U steel, but
> interurbans had added a piece of flat steel in the upper U.
> Boris
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list