[PRCo] Re: Location?

James B. Holland PRCoPCC at P-R-Co.com
Sun Nov 20 03:02:54 EST 2005


Here's a few more, Mark!!!!!!!



http://lists.dementia.org/files/pittsburgh-railways/4778_42-38.jpg

http://lists.dementia.org/files/pittsburgh-railways/4778Library.jpg

http://lists.dementia.org/files/pittsburgh-railways/02-68car.jpg

http://lists.dementia.org/files/pittsburgh-railways/02-myphoto7.jpeg

http://lists.dementia.org/files/pittsburgh-railways/Kopie%20-%20pitt076.jpg

http://lists.dementia.org/files/pittsburgh-railways/PRC5432-9Bus090956.JPG

http://lists.dementia.org/files/pittsburgh-railways/02-5432-54.JPG

http://lists.dementia.org/files/pittsburgh-railways/1537%20unknown.jpg




-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	[PRCo] Re: Location?
Date: 	Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:22:21 -0800
From: 	James B. Holland <PRCoPCC at P-R-Co.com>
Reply-To: 	pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
To: 	pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
References: 	<20051108.163601.29636.57495 at webmail29.lax.untd.com> 
<4371D5D3.1070506 at P-R-Co.com>



 >> Mark McGuire wrote:

 >> From what I've seen, railfans liked to have the dest. sign matching
 >> or at least close to where they were at the time. The PRMA map of
 >> 1959 shows St. Clair (between Highland and Negley) as early trackage.
 >> I don't know anything about this but maybe this was once St.Clair
 >> Transfer. From the routes covered in Jim's post I would surmise that
 >> this may be Euclid between Penn and Centre. Perhaps this trackage was
 >> used to get to and from rts 75 and 88???? Just a novice's guess.

 > James B. Holland wrote:

 > EXCELLENT detective work. Railfans Often use Out Of Town dustynation
 > signs and this was my first impression -- had never seen anything like
 > this on PRCo! Railfans often like to purposely confuse destination
 > signs as well like using East End signs in West End -- have seen many
 > such photos. PITTSBURGH is displayed on JTC PCC 408 when PERC members
 > went there for an excursion.


Out Of Place Destination signs on FunTrips:::::::


http://206.103.49.193/pitts/htm/wvp072.htm

http://206.103.49.193/pitts/htm/wvp075.htm

http://206.103.49.193/pitts/htm/wvp098.htm --
                is photo caption mislabeled??

http://206.103.49.193/pitts/htm/wvp106.htm

http://206.103.49.193/pitts/htm/wvp132.htm

http://206.103.49.193/pitts/htm/wvp136.htm --
                don't remember if we ever fingered out this location!!

http://206.103.49.193/pitts/htm/wvp145.htm

http://206.103.49.193/pitts/htm/wvp185.htm --
                is photo caption mislabeled??

http://206.103.49.193/pitts/htm/wvp189.htm --
                St. Clair Transfer Again!!

http://206.103.49.193/pitts/htm/wvp192.htm --
                *-New-* Butler Interurban!!!

http://206.103.49.193/pitts/htm/wvp229.htm --
                *-New-* Butler Interurban!!!

http://206.103.49.193/pitts/htm/wvp231.htm --
                Probably NOT Railfuns!!

http://206.103.49.193/pitts/htm/wvp283.htm --
                Not out of Place but Definitely Out Of Date by
                6-years -- and appears like
                St.Clair Transfer behind -- 1111!!!!

http://206.103.49.193/pitts/htm/wvp299.htm

http://206.103.49.193/pitts/htm/wvp301.htm

http://206.103.49.193/pitts/htm/wvp323.htm

http://206.103.49.193/pitts/htm/wvp325.htm -
                Revenue Service Standard Practice, not RailFuns!!!

http://206.103.49.193/pitts/htm/wvp421.htm --
                going to Castle Shannon, yes, but not on 37!!


THIS____ONE____TOTALLY____WRONG:::::::

http://206.103.49.193/pitts/htm/wvp423.htm -- Photo Caption Reads::::

""""#1161, a former St. Louis Public Service car, on a fan trip on New 
Arlington Avenue which is the line over the top of Mt. Washington that 
still exists as a diversion when the tunnel is out of service for some 
reason. The passing siding was midway up the hill and in the vicinity of 
the Knoxville Incline Railway which has since been discontinued.
Note the St. Louis roll sign
April 24, 1960
Bill Volkmer photo""""

I sent Dave a correction to this but he has obviously not posted 
it!!!!!!! PRCo NEVER had used PCCs -- all their PCCs were Originals!!! 
Yes, location correct but Please Never Confuse PRCo with SLPS! -- NEVER!!!!


http://206.103.49.193/pitts/htm/wvp427.htm




Jim__Holland


I__Like__Ike.......And__PCCs!!

down with pantographs ---- UP___WITH___TROLLEYPOLES!!!!!!!




More information about the Pittsburgh-railways mailing list