[PRCo] Re: WP__Equipment__Assignments
James B. Holland
PRCoPCC at P-R-Co.com
Sat Oct 29 05:48:14 EDT 2005
Fredbruhn at aol.com wrote:
> I've tried to research this somewhat using photos mostly and it seems
> there is "some" barn assignment, but I don't think it is cut in stone.
>
> I think the 700's without lavatories were assigned to the Fairchance
> line. I don't have my material in front of me, but 706 seems to be
> the usual car.
> The last day service, or at least the last scheduled car was 732 or
> 736 (without looking to check) which was pictured in the first PERC
> West Penn booklet.
>
> 709 was used on Brownsville a lot, and 712 on Latrobe, but others
> obviously joined them on the daily schedules.
>
> Fred (the other Fred, not the Dr nor titanium Fred)
Fred Schneider wrote:
> What week are you asking?
> In later years 705 and 706 worked Fairchance.
> Before those 700s were reworked for one-man service in
> ...............the early 1940s, 800s worked Fairchance. I have a
> picture of 831 on the line. Prior to that possibly low 200s.
>
> 1931 car house roster.
Thank You to the *-Other-Fred,-* Ed, and Fred! This is Very
Interesting Information! I'm arranging it all here in this email
to keep it together. I remember mention of 800s on Fairchance and
this has cleared up the dates. Shall snip and edit one or two of
the emails for further detailed comments.
Fred Schneider wrote:
> Regular service - never according to EHL who is standing behind me
> [RE: 700s to McKeesport, Trafford, Irwin.].
> No. 739 was in Trafford on a fantrip.
> Car 711 was in Irwin on fantrip in 1951.
>
> Trafford worked in conjunction with McKeesport - Irwin out of
> McKeesport until McKeesport services were abandoned. I've seen
> pictures of 208 and 210 working this service.
>
> fws
Fred Schneider wrote:
> Actually it was pretty much cast in stone until the very end when the
> company switched around those cars that ran to replace those that wore
> out.
> Before that, for example, the 730s were always mainline cars.
>
> The 712 you mentioned as a Latrobe car was earlier on a Brownsville
> car. Depends on the year.
>
>> Assignments may have had a lot to do with what tax licenses might
>> have paid on which cars in which boroughs and we have records of
>> which towns had taxes and which cars were licensed, if any. But this
>> could have been a consideration.
>
Jim__Holland
I__Like__Ike.......And__PCCs!!
down with pantographs ---- UP___WITH___TROLLEYPOLES!!!!!!!
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list