[PRCo] TrolleyCar___Speed

Holland Electric Rwy. Op. H.E.R.O. -- Import SPTC 1.48 Models // James B. Holland PRCoPCC at P-R-Co.com
Sun Apr 2 00:05:06 EST 2006


Included are a number of emails from another list dealing with  
TrolleyCar // StreetCar  speed.       The discussion started with an 
observation that the current  StreetCars  in  Portland,  OR  --  as 
opposed to the  lrvs  --  were limited to 30-mph Top Speed.       It was 
later learned that this is a governed limit as the  Portland  
StreetCars  are designed and built for about the same balancing speed of 
a PCC,  near 40-mph.
.
Some of the comments are from People Within The Transit Profession, but 
even then these people suffer from the same that the rest of us suffer  
--  humanity and the tendency to remember conditions the way we want to 
remember them!!       Some comments need to be taken with a grain of 
salt and compared to facts // statistics elsewhere for validation!!!
.
.
_______________
-----------------------------------
.
 > From: "geoghb at xyz.abc
 > Subject: RE: Re: 30 mph Streetcars
.
 > It seems to me the safest of all operations within streets are 
those commensurate with other vehicular traffic.       Given a 35mph 
street  -  the real auto speeds will be closer to 45 mph, the rail line 
should not get in the way of natural  (posted limits are generally 
unnaturally low)  speed and cause frustration, road rage and anger 
to motorists.       Thus, the rail vehicles should be driven by the  
[well trained]  operators to keep up with other traffic flows and not 
create more congestion.       Eliminate the governors, both on rail cars 
and state houses.
.
 > Posted speed limits, the legal limit, are often contrary to each 
other and natural traffic flow.       Road warrior traffic engineers are 
often at fault for creating dangerous situations with poorly regulated 
speed limits and 'camping out' traffic signals and poorly designed 
roads, ramps, and intersections.       Unfortunately, just about anyone 
attempting to drive the legal limit will be creating more hazzard than 
going with the flow - sort of like trying to prevent water to seek its 
own level.
.
 > In my own neighborhood there are two streets, both with center 
islands and two lanes in each direction.       The shorter one with 
cross streets on both sides entering into heavily used shopping centers 
has a 40 mph speed limit.       The other, with 2 traffic signaled 
intersections several blocks apart without any driveways or commercial 
entrances and clear view is rated at 30 mph.       The second one, of 
course, is radar trap alley.
.
 > Thus, what is legally posted is indeed  'lawful'  but doesn't make it 
good, better, correct, or safer.       Basically, a money making 
proposition more than anything else.
.
 > Anyone on this list who has never violated a traffic ordinance is 
privileged to reply.
.
 > George
.
.
_______________
-----------------------------------
.
From: "James B. Holland" <PRCoPCC at P-R-Co.com>
Subject: Re: 30 mph Streetcars
.
.
Sorry, but this is  Dead  Wrong!       Professional  Drivers would  Not  
exceed the speed limit  'To  Keep  Up  With  The  Jones / Smiths / etc.'
.
Two  Wrongs  Do  Not  Make  A ______________.
.
Agree with your observations, George  --  speed limits exceeded 
everywhere on a regular basis  --  but this should  Never  be a reason 
to justify so doing by  Anyone.      PROFESSIONALs  Never  advocate that 
public transit travel faster than the posted speed limit.        In 
Fact, here in SF, the Muni requires that  ALL  transit vehicles slow to 
15-mph in Intersections regardless of other posted speed limits  --  
Unless the posted speed limits are lower  --  and to Never travel more 
than 25-mph at other times!       Professional Drivers   --  Rail 
Transit, lrvs, cable cars, buses, trucks, etc.  --  Are Held To A Higher 
Standard than other vehicle drivers on the road.
.
 From pg.305  The__Time__of__the__Trolley  (Wm. D. Middleton)  bottom 
picture caption:       """...When  BCE  put its first PCC in service in 
1938, the operator was promptly arrested for speeding."""
.
 >From pg.251  PCC__Coast__to__Coast:       """In January 1938  BCER  
became the first Canadian property to purchase a  PCC  car...   car 400 
arrived in Vancouver during December 1938.       Shortly thereafter, one 
of its motormen received a speeding ticket from the Vancouver Police 
Department."""
.
If  ANY   driver is observing the speed limit it is  Not  The  Fault  
of  That  Driver  when someone else goes into road rage and violates the 
speed limit  --  it Is the fault of the Road Rage Driver.
.
Professional Drivers are trained to  Avoid  Accidents  and  Are  Often  
Charged  with accidents,  Not because they collided with other 
vehicles,  but because conditions allowed other vehicles to collide with 
the vehicle driven by a Professional.       If a  Professional  Driver  
is changing lanes  At  An  Angle  and is hit by another vehicle, the 
other driver may bear some responsibility but the  Pro  Driver  WILL  be 
charged with an  Avoidable  Accident  by his company.       Same for a 
bus stopped at a bus stop at an angle instead of parallel and within a 
foot of the curb  --  bus driver  STOPPED  at a  Bus  Stop  At  An  
Angle,  flashers flashing,  WILL  be charged with an  Avoidable  
Accident  by his company when another vehicle hits that bus.
.
Your last comment, George, is beneath you and I shall forget it was ever 
written  --  intimidation to make a point is unnecessary.
.
.
_______________
-----------------------------------
.
 > From: stennyson at xyz.abc
.
 > George...  is correct.       Safety requires all vehicles proceed at 
the same speed in the same lane.       If police do not enforce the law, 
that is another problem but professional drivers do not want to be 
charges with accidents, They will try to be safe.
.
.
_______________
-----------------------------------
.
From: "James B. Holland" <PRCoPCC at P-R-Co.com>
.
AGREED  on observations of  What  Actually  Happens!       As already 
mentioned,  however,  Pros Never Advocate violation of the law.       In 
fact,  rules for  Professional  Drivers  <Often  Require>  Pro  Drivers  
to drive at speeds  Lower  Than  Those  Posted  --  Avoidance of 
Accidents is the Policy,  Not who is at fault after the fact.       
Again, it is  NEVER  the fault of the driver who observes the speed 
limit when someone else loses patience with the same driver and violates 
the limit and thus causes an accident.
.
In reality, the observations made here on human activity paint a  Bad  
Picture  of  Society  As  A  Whole  --  We  are not as pretty as we like 
to paint ourselves.
.
.
_______________
-----------------------------------
.
 > From: stennyson at xyz.abc
.
 > In Pittsburgh in 1938,  Pittsburgh introduced  PCC  cars with six of 
them replacing seven same size old cars.        Faster operation made 
that possible although older cars were speeded up to stay out of the 
way.       In 1939, the Safety Committee came to Trustee and General 
Manager Tom Fitzgerald petitioning him to slow the PCC cars down,.       
Too many accidents
 > Fitzgerald thought about it and determined that he could not afford 
to pay for the PCC cars if he slowed them down.       They attracted 12 
percent more riders  (revenue)  with speed and more comfort.       They 
saved 14 percent on costs by eliminating every seventh car and its 
motorman.       In 1938 it was awful tough to meet payroll.
 > He ruled :full speed ahead and damn the torpedoes.       People will 
have learn to stay out of the way and respect street cars       
Automobiles have far more accidents than street cars and they do not 
slow down..
 > I arrived in Pittsburgh in 1940 and soon learned that college kids 
did learn to respect the street cars.       They quit trying to beat 
them  (most of the time)       By 1948 when I was in the Research 
Department of P.Ry.Co I got to work safety statistics when the regular 
man was off.       Pittsburgh had a very good safety record, but Toronto 
with more PCC cars was even better.       The best in North America PCC 
cars had electric magnetic track brakes to help stop in an 
emergency.       They were not used normally as too fast a stop threw 
people down in the aisle or bruised them on stanchions or seat frames.
.
.
_______________
-----------------------------------
.
From: "James B. Holland" <PRCoPCC at P-R-Co.com>
.
Strange  --  Schneider and Carlson on pg.161 of  PCC__Coast__To__Coast  
indicate that the Speeded Up Old Cars in Pittsburgh had  <Lower>  
accident rates:::       """By 1931 there were 129 high-speed [old, 
pre-PCC] cars, and eventually the number reached 424.       But, despite 
their increased speed and lower accident rates compared to the low-speed 
versions.,..."""       The speeded-up cars had far more responsive and 
positive acceleration and braking.
.
I have an 30-page report issued by the PCC committee on  1938.10.18  
indicating that accident rates for  PCC  cars were greatly reduced 
compared to older cars.       Here is a quote from the Brooklyn section 
of the report  [Brooklyn Known for High Density Traffic!!,]  not unusual 
in this report for other properties as well:::
.
"""Accidents... for fiscal years ending June 30, 1937 and 1938,... on 
the Smith-Coney Island line, indicated a decrease of approximately 8% in 
the number of accidents with an increase of 33% in the number of 
passengers carried."""
.
"""Results of operation to the present, comparing the two fiscal years 
mentioned above, on a mileage basis, the accidents have decreased 24% 
and 16% respectively on the Smith-Coney Island and the 
McDonald-Vanderbilt lines.       On the basis of passengers carried, the 
reduction is 28.3% and 27.6% respectively."""
.
.
Accident___Reduction___For___PITTSBURGH::
.
"""As shown by the table  [Not  Herein  Included],  the accidents per 
10,000 car miles were reduced on every Fifth Avenue route in the period 
after the installation of PCC cars;  and for the group as a whole, the 
accidents per 10,000 car miles decreased from 3.40 to 2.86  --  a 
reduction of 15.9%.       The urban system accidents decreased from 3.10 
per 10,000 car miles to 2.65  --  a decrease of 14.5%.       The urban 
systems operations include, of course, considerable PCC car mileage 
during the 12 month period ending July 31, 1938."""
.
"""The accident and mileage figures for the Fifth Avenue routes cover 
the entire operations of the lines.       However,  the PCC cars operate 
only about 74% of this mileage, because peak service is filled in with 
speeded up, old standard cars."""
.
.
_______________
-----------------------------------
.
 > From: stennyson at xyz.abc
.
 > Modern Light Rail cars of all types average 0.9 casulaties per 
million passenger-miles but buses suffer twice as many with 1.8.       
Why are buses not limited to 30 miles per hour ?
.
 > E d T e n n y s o n
.
.
_______________
-----------------------------------
.
From: "James B. Holland" <PRCoPCC at P-R-Co.com>
.
Buses In The City Are limited to 25-mph Top Speed in San Francisco  --  
15-mph through intersections.       So Are  <lrvs >  on surface streets  
--  ALL  this regardless of  How  High  the posted speed limit.       
Motor coaches on freeways are exempt from the 25-mph limit.
.
Modern Light Rail is  <Mostly>  Private  Right  Of  Way  (prw)  By  
Definition  whereas  PCCs  and  TrolleyCars  of yore were primarily  
Street  Vehicles, as are motor coaches.       This is comparing apples 
and oranges.
.
.
_______________
-----------------------------------
.
 > From: Frank S. Miklos
.
 > Someone I know from Pittburgh clocked a PCC car on Second Avenue 
reaching a speed of 55 mph.       This was on the long stretch of street 
running paralleling the Monongahela River and the B & O Railroad where 
there were no intersecting streets and no consequently no traffic 
lights.       He also clocked a PCC car on Forbes Avenue through 
Schenley Park at over 45 mph.
.
 > Frank
.
.
_______________
-----------------------------------
.
 > From: "R. J. Halperin"
.
 > Based on information I gleaned from the engineers at GE,  I would 
suspect that something was wrong with that guy's speedometer.       
While the balancing speed of those cars was 42-45 mph, there was a 
strong likelihood that the bands on the motor would fail at a speed of 
55mph,  depending upon how long that speed was maintained.       I've 
heard people in Detroit say their PCCs went 80 mph!
.
.
_______________
-----------------------------------
.
From: "James B. Holland" <PRCoPCC at P-R-Co.com>
.
This is borne out by other engineers as well.        Believe it or not, 
there is an individual who claimed he clocked one Pittsburgh 87-Ardmore 
PCC Inbound on Ardmore Blvd.  (center of the highway prw  --  Inbound is 
Mostly UpHill, by the way)  at 90-mph!!!!!!!       This was about 1960  
--  only thing I can see is that he got caught at a red light and 
personally did 90-mph to catch the trolley after that but I personally 
doubt the PCC even got near 40-mph UpHill let alone 90!!!
.
.
_______________
-----------------------------------
.
From: "James B. Holland" <PRCoPCC at P-R-Co.com>
.
I have to question that speed on Second Avenue  --  this was down by the 
steel mills and a narrow street with dog-leg gentle curves but curves 
through which I would Fear traveling 55-mph.       And after the rebuild 
in the 1950s to accommodate the Parkway East, there is absolutely  NO  
way one would negotiate the realigned curves at more than 15 to 20 
mph.       Forbes into Schenley or Frick Park, yes  --  45-mph very 
possible  --  modestly downhill OB near Frick Park.
.
The PRCo 1601 series Air-Electric PCCs did have governor control which 
cut power to the motors at a pre determined speed  (about the 42-mph 
balancing speed)  --  it was necessary to release the power pedal, allow 
the car to slow, and reapply power to regain power.       On the 
1700-series All-Electric PCCs, the governor did the same but one could 
keep the power pedal engaged and power would return when the car 
slowed.       Have experienced this on 17s outbound on Library 
Interurban, outbound of Hillcrest.       Have experienced same on the 
1601s but can't remember location offhand  --  will probably remember 
after I send the email.
.
ETI-Skoda TrolleyCoaches here in SF work similarly to PRCo 1700s  --  
power cuts at 41-mph and returns at about 38-mph.
.
.
_______________
-----------------------------------
.
 > From: stennyson at xyz.abc
Subject: Re: Re: Portland streetcars - max speed only 30 mph??
.
PCC cars were designed and geared for 42 miles per hour with 50 top 
speed as downhill, or tailwind,  That was the specification.       They 
were designed to resist going faster,
.
However in 1949, Pittsburgh equipped about 30 PCC cars with B-3 trucks 
and shock absorbers for interurban service.       They could make the 
same schedule as faster old interurban cars because they could 
accelerate and brake faster,  I often rode them and they could exceed 60 
miles per hour down hill,       True, I have no speedometer but I did 
pace one once in my car down in Meadowlands on the Washington PA 
line.       There were carhouse rumors that some motormen could exceed 
50 with city cars if they pumped the accelerator in a certain way.
.
E d T e n n y s o n
.
.
_______________
-----------------------------------
.
 > From: stennyson at xyz.abc
Subject: Re: Re: 30 mph Streetcars
.
Pittsburgh Railways never used GE cars on Second Avenue or on the 
interurban, GE and Westinghouse cars have subtle differences, I am sure 
none ever made 90 mph but folk lore rumors from motorists mentioned 70. 
I strongly doubt that also
.
E d T e n n y s o n
.
.
.
.
Jim__Holland
.
.
I__Like__Ike.......And__PCCs!!
.
down with pantographs ---- UP___WITH___TROLLEYPOLES!!!!!!!




More information about the Pittsburgh-railways mailing list