[PRCo] Re: Rail

[Fred Schneider]

No, the web is still there.   But remember, Boris, they had no money  
to fix it and they were going to tear it up in a few months anyway.    
By that time there was a lot of bad track.   It would wear down to  
the point where the guard would simply wear off.   And if you thought  
it was bad in Pittsburgh, it was worse in Philadelphia under SEPTA.

On Dec 16, 2006, at 5:10 PM, Boris Cefer wrote:

> Yes, but the blocks might loosen and cause a derailment.
> Forget, I am from the other side... :-)
>
> B
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bob Dietrich" <bdietrich at comcast.net>
> To: <pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org>
> Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 10:44 PM
> Subject: [PRCo] Re: Rail
>
>
>> There is nothing wrong with the rail.  Who needs a guard (rail) in  
>> the
>> middle of a straight segment of track?
>>
>> Before anyone asks it is inbound on Mt. Washington approaching Shaler
> Street
>> on Grandview Ave.  But then you all knew that.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org
>> [mailto:pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org] On Behalf  
>> Of Boris
>> Cefer
>> Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 3:32 PM
>> To: PRCo
>> Subject: [PRCo] Rail
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain;
>> charset="iso-8859-2"
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>> Note the rail. Repair needed!
>>
>> B
>>
>>
>> -- Attached file removed by Ecartis and put at URL below --
>> -- Type: application/octet-stream
>> -- Size: 176k (180376 bytes)
>> -- URL : http://lists.dementia.org/files/pittsburgh-railways/ 
>> 1215100.jpg
>>
>>
>
>