[PRCo] Re: OT Boston
Ken & Tracie
ktjosephson at earthlink.net
Sat Apr 28 10:19:27 EDT 2007
I remember riding the Kenosha PCCs during the Paul Weyrich fantrip, circa
1999. The cars had trucks from retired CTA "Spam Cans" (6000s.)
The wheels were awful. The late Joe McCarthy explained to us that
replacement wheels were in the works.
As I recall, the 6000s at speed were fun to ride as long as the trainset or
car you were in had good wheels. I can imagine the pounding truck components
took at 40 mph with all four wheels having multiple flat spots.
K.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Russell E Jackson" <russell.jackson at stvinc.com>
To: "Boris Cefer" <westinghouse at iol.cz>
Cc: <pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org>
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 10:39 AM
Subject: [PRCo] Re: OT Boston
> On what? On CTA 6000s, at least 500,000 miles. (they pay no attention to
> flats)
>
> Russ
>
>
>
>
> "Boris Cefer"
> <westinghouse at iol
> .cz> To
> <pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org>,
> 04/27/2007 12:30 "Russell E Jackson"
> PM <russell.jackson at stvinc.com>
> cc
>
> Subject
> [PRCo] Re: OT Boston
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Is there any approximate estimate of a wheel (tire member) life?
>
> B
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Russell E Jackson" <russell.jackson at stvinc.com>
> To: "Fred Schneider" <fwschneider at comcast.net>; <boriscefer at yahoo.com>
> Cc: <pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 5:57 PM
> Subject: [PRCo] Re: OT Boston
>
>
>> Boris - Fred is basically correct as to the legal issues, although you
>> will
>> find opening windows on a number of other cars, particularly in San
>> Francisco. We know that FWS is always on a soap box. But I think it is
>> still sensible to air condition the cars. You cannot have them be the
>> only
>> not air conditioned part of the fleet. It is not a museum. As for the
>> wheels, I seem to remember that the issue was bad ground shunts, with the
>> possibility of not shunting the signal circuits. (Another badly managed
>> outfit in Philly had many cars operating with broken shunts.) It is
> said
>> that there were several instances of this, which brought the Public
>> Utilities Commission into the picture. In a typical Boston stupid
>> decision, they got rid of the resilient wheels. They disappeared on the
>> CTA because they were using only the D-1 wheel, and cracks were occurring
>> in the welded back plates, and the manufacturer had left the business and
>> had no interest in improving the design. I cannot say I know why a
>> different wheel design such as the SAB was not considered, except that
>> back
>> then they were not in the US market at all. So it was easy (and cheaper)
>> to change to the solid wheels. The wheel life in those light cars was so
>> long that they lasted from one truck overhaul to the next, so there was
> no
>> great change in maintenance costs. Kashin says that one Brooklyn car
> was
>> tested with the SAB wheels, but there is no picture or document proof
> that
>> I know of. Possibly at SAB in the archives. Or in a Kashin box
>> somewhere.
>>
>> Russ Jackson
>
>
>
>
> Visit us at our redesigned website: http://www.stvinc.com.
>
> The information contained in this electronic message is intended only for
> the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
> contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
> disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the
> intended recipient, you are informed that any dissemination, copying or
> disclosure of the material contained herein, in whole or in part, is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
> please notify STV and purge this message.
>
>
>
-- Attached file removed by Ecartis and put at URL below --
-- Type: image/jpeg
-- Size: 52k (54021 bytes)
-- URL : http://lists.dementia.org/files/pittsburgh-railways/cta44.jpg
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list