[PRCo] Re: The "Light Rail ex-1600 1700s"

[Boris Cefer]

You would need a battery with higher capacity and a MG set with higher
output to provide sufficient energy for added circuits.

B

----- Original Message -----
From: "Boris Cefer" <westinghouse at iol.cz>
To: <pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 11:11 PM
Subject: [PRCo] Re: The "Light Rail ex-1600 1700s"


>> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Holland" <prcopcc at p-r-co.com>
> To: "- 1714 PRCo__WP__JTC -" <pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 10:37 PM
> Subject: [PRCo] Re: The "Light Rail ex-1600 1700s"
>
> > .
> > The problems you experienced with the ex-1601 series PCCs converted to
> > 177x+++ were created by  ({[pat]})  and were not inherent in the car
> > when under PRCo.       A separate battery should have been used, not the
> > control battery.
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > Jim___Holland