[PRCo] Re: Cleveland

Herb Brannon hrbran at sbcglobal.net
Sun Jan 14 10:42:35 EST 2007


Yes, Cleveland has come a loooooooooooong way since the Cuyahoga River caught fire in the 1960's. It is a rather odd fact that, in the United States, a 'good economy' can seldom be nationwide. Rather, it is regional. Some area do well for a few decades, then the 'good times' move to another region. Strange, indeed.
Bob Rathke <bobrathke at comcast.net> wrote:  Herb's comments describe just the opposite situations in Cleveland and 
Pittsburgh in the late 1960's and early 70's when I lived in Cleveland. In 
those years, downtown Cleveland was dead after 5PM, and many old buildings 
had been torn down but not replaced with new structures. At that same era 
in Pittsburgh, people were staying downtown for the restaurants and theater, 
and new buildingconstruction and rennovation was cranking up. Around 1970 I 
worked with several people in Cleveland who took more than one weekend trip 
to Pittsburgh to enjoy the attractions there.

Bob 1/13/07
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Holland" 

To: 

Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 4:40 AM
Subject: [PRCo] Cleveland


> Herb Brannon wrote:
> .
>
>> This is the main reason I moved back to my hometown.................
>> Cleveland is everything a 'Steel City' should be. Something happened
>> sometime after 1985 that changed Pittsburgh far too much. I concur
>> with the comments of the writer.
>
> .
> Maybe we should expand the list coverage to include Cleveland -- isn't
> it a Division of WP -- West of Pennsylvania??!! :-) ;-)
> .
> Do you plan to transfer to Shaker when you have enough snority?
> .
> Impressions of Shaker Operation??
> .
> .
> .
> Jim___Holland
>
>
> 





Herb Brannon




More information about the Pittsburgh-railways mailing list