[PRCo] Re: True Tales Of The Operators -- Another Installment
Fred Schneider
fwschneider at comcast.net
Sat Mar 24 20:22:30 EDT 2007
ED LYBARGER:
TIM JONES:
IF WE DON'T HAVE AN ORAL HISTORY / EMPLOYEES HISTORY SECTION IN THE
LIBRARY, THIS SOUND LIKE A GREAT START PIECE TO PRINT OUT.
FRED SCHNEIDER
On Mar 24, 2007, at 7:52 PM, Herb Brannon wrote:
> This one I like to call, "He Should Have Taken The $500.00."
>
>
> It was a Summer Sunday night when the Mt. Washington Tunnel was
> closed for rebuilding. Also on weekends everything was going both
> directions over the Arlington Avenue and Warrington Avenue tracks.
> Like I said it was Summer. I was working a night run on 35 and 36
> beginning around 5:00 pm and getting off at 2:30 am. Around 8 pm a
> line of strong thunderstorms moved through the Pittsburgh area
> doing as much damage as they could before it all ended around 10
> pm. Some wires were knocked down by the wind near South Hills Jct.
> This caused all the streetlamps and building circuits on Warrington
> Avenue to go out.
>
> With no lights burning in the building and with all the
> streetlamps out along Warrington it was nearly pitch black. I had a
> trip coming off the 35 and arriving in the city around 12 midnight.
> I was running late and was trying to make up as much time as
> possible where I could. I left the S. Hill Jct Administration
> Building and took the switch onto the right-of-way heading to
> Warrington Avenue. Car 1702 was a good runner and held the track
> without much bounce or sway. The car glided onto Warrington Avenue.
> I turned on the "interurban" roof headlight because of the dark
> conditions on the street. Looking ahead the street was clear, no
> traffic coming or going, so I picked up the speed. We crossed
> Beltzhover and I gave another application of power and the car
> responded accordingly.
>
> Now, after Beltzhoover the curbstones on Warrington were
> abnormally high, and I mean ABNORMALLY high. Most curbs are about
> 10 or less inches from the street surface to the sidewalk surface.
> Not these. They were nearly 18 inches, if not more. Therefore any
> auto parked against the curb was not going to be moved onto the
> sidewalk by any physical forces applied to that autos left side.
> Also, bear in mind that there was not enough room to park a 1970s
> auto between the curb and the outside car track. Everyone parking
> on Warrington Avenue put the right side of their auto up on the
> curb or sidewalk to keep clear of the car tracks. That could not be
> done is this strip of Warrington.
>
> Just at the last minute I saw the form of an auto, painted in
> dull black primer, sitting against the curb...........the very high
> curb. I said something like, Holy FXXX and jammed the brake pedal
> to the lock position and reached down with my right hand and did
> what was called "throwing the hook", or putting the direction
> controller handle in the up-most position. This assisted in making
> a full emergency stop. I then got my right hand back up on the sand
> switch. Interurban cars would not run sand even when put into
> emergency. Things were now running in the usual "slow motion" which
> takes over during such events. The car was trying to stop. I could
> even feel the physical forces (easier to do in a mass moving in a
> straight line) of forward motion trying to be arrested by the
> braking action. It now seemed very quiet almost like the streetcar
> was a fast moving watercraft with propellers in reverse. I turned
> my head and looked out the number 1 door, through the glass in the
> bottom and saw the rear bumper of the auto appear. Next the quiet
> became one of the loudest sounds I ever heard as 28,350 pounds of
> heavy steel pinned a tin-can stock 1963 Chrysler product between it
> and the curbstones. The trolley did not stop its assault on the
> auto until all 42 feet had restyled the autos body and came to a
> stop three feet past the auto.
>
> The results on 1702 were hardly noticeable. The bottom glass in
> the number 1 door was cracked, not broken, but only cracked. The
> paint on the bottom of the number one and number two doors was
> scratched in several places but nothing that 15 minutes of cosmetic
> repair work could correct. The rub rail on the open side of the
> trolley had a few minor scratches.
>
> The auto, however, was another story. I was now flat as a pancake
> on the left side from the rear to the front. Also, it was now three
> or four inches narrower that it was before being introduced to the
> power of a 1949, well built, streetcar. The only window glass
> remaining in the auto were the front and rear right side windows.
> Left side windows, windshield, and rear window were things of the
> past. The guy who owned the car was standing outside one of the row
> houses talking with his buddy's when this took place. No one was in
> the car, thank God.
>
> Now, after all was said and done, I only got called into the
> Superintendent's Office to explain what happened. I was not charged
> with the accident. I wondered why but was certainly not going to
> ask the Superintendent to go ahead and give me a chargeable accident.
>
> About a month later I got a note from the Claims Department that
> the guy who owned the car was suing PATransit and I should come by
> the head office and get the court date. I did and then appeared in
> court. The PAT attorney came up and introduced himself and said,
> "Don't worry one bit about this. We will only be here about five
> minutes or less. You won't even have to get on the stand." That was
> fine with me and I settled back in the hard wood seat to watch the
> drama unfold. The great trolley caper was the first case called.
> The PAT attorney got up and holding a small booklet in his hand,
> said to the judge, "Your honor I need to call to the attention of
> the court the Motor Vehicle Code of the City of Pittsburgh." He
> went on, to the court, "I'm sorry we are using this but it is the
> law." He then went on to quote a law, probably on the books for a
> century, but still very valid which more or less states that if
> anyone blocks the car tracks with their auto they will have no
> recourse and will have to stand ALL damages by themselves. As it
> turned out PAT had offered the man $500 for the old car and he
> turned it down hoping to get rich in court. He of course never read
> the Motor Vehicle Code of the City of Pittsburgh, or at least not
> the section covering streetcars. The PAT attorney asked the court
> that the plaintiff pay, and was granted $350.00 for repairs to car
> 1702, $75.00 to cover my costs for appearing and just sitting there
> and all court and legal fees. The judge agreed. The guy now had to
> pay well over $500.00 for all this. Like I said at the beginning,
> he should have taken the $500.00!
>
> Herb Brannon
>
>
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list