[PRCo] Re: Pittsburgh - think tank blasts possible new transit taxes
John Swindler
j_swindler at hotmail.com
Mon Sep 10 10:05:45 EDT 2007
Concerning ridership numbers, in Pa, as SEPTA goes, so goes the state (Pa
ridership numbers)
On a national level, as New York City goes, so goes the the national
ridership numbers. I ran across an interesting comment concerning NYCTA
about a year ago. Attributed the increase in subway ridership to continuing
influx of immigrants to the city. For instance, Astoria was claimed to have
a large Russian population. Filed this under more useless trivia to
clutter up my memory. (:>)
John
>From: Joshua Dunfield <joshuad at cs.cmu.edu>
>Reply-To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
>To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
>Subject: [PRCo] Re: Pittsburgh - think tank blasts possible new transit
>taxes Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 02:29:50 -0400
>
>Bill Robb wrote:
> > What you fail to realize is that subsidies did not exist before the
>early 70s.
>
>So what? Cities weren't heavily dependent on cars once, either.
>The mere fact that it was once possible for urban transit to have
>operational
>self-sufficiency (a phrase from a slightly different context...) is no
>reason
>to demand that it do so today.
>
>Really, why should urban mass transit make money? Should we require that
>police
>departments break even (operationally)? Should they charge user fees?
>
> > Subsidized transit service is
> > not available to the majority only an (largely) urban minority.
>
>Looks like a pretty big minority. Pennsylvania has 12 million people. The
>SEPTA
>region has 3.8 million people. Allegheny County (PAT goes outside the
>county a
>bit, but not enough to matter) has 1.3 million people. That's close to
>half
>already and I haven't started in on Harrisburg, Altoona, etc.
>
>[...]
> > The concept of service to
> > all within a community is now close to be dropped by several places,
>notably San Jose
> > and Toronto.
>
>I knew the TTC was going through a budget snafu, but I didn't know they
>were going through an existential crisis. The "Transit City" plans don't
>look like an existential crisis to me.
>
>[...]
> > Subsidies are evil. They are what is
> > killing transit.
>
>If transit is dying, why is ridership increasing?
>
>-j.
>
_________________________________________________________________
Share your special parenting moments!
http://www.reallivemoms.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list