[PRCo] Re: Millvale & roll signs & Interurbans?

Edward H. Lybarger trams2 at comcast.net
Thu Sep 13 16:47:18 EDT 2007


You bet...on open track.  Not necessarily as well in street track.

-----Original Message-----
From: pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org
[mailto:pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org]On Behalf Of Boris
Cefer
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 11:47 AM
To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
Subject: [PRCo] Re: Millvale & roll signs & Interurbans?


Did they really ride better than the city cars?

B

----- Original Message -----
From: "Herb Brannon" <hrbran at sbcglobal.net>
To: <pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 5:04 PM
Subject: [PRCo] Re: Millvale & roll signs & Interurbans?


> Unless it was a dire emergency PATransit would not place interurban PCCs
> on 42--43--42-/38--49. Even 37-Shannon had mostly city type PCCs assigned.
> This is why I prefered to work in 35 and 36 lines..............I had a
> better riding car.
>
> Herb Brannon







More information about the Pittsburgh-railways mailing list