[PRCo] Re: PRCo
Boris Cefer
westinghouse at iol.cz
Sun Sep 16 01:31:45 EDT 2007
Does it make sense that PRCo oredered 100 cars only several days after the
arrival of the DEMONSTRATOR??? Wasn't the purport of the date (1936.04.06)
different? It looks that the construction of this car started far before
this date.
Do photos of 100 when new/fresh/clean/dent free suggest hot summer or early
spring?
B
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Holland" <PRCoPCC at P-R-Co.com>
To: "- 1714 PRCo__WP__JTC -" <pittsburgh-railways at lists.dementia.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2007 11:58 PM
Subject: [PRCo] PRCo
> .
> Ed: Boris wrote and Asked the very same thing I was thinking -- car
> delivered in June -- Why All The Heavy Coats~?~!~? Car Looks
> Very New Yet -- Too New for October Nov of 1936.
> .
> Only answers I could get is that it was much later in the year for some
> reason except that it Does Say Demon-Strator and if it was a special
> roll sign it would have been removed by late 1936, but still
> available. Think you checked once and found that the car arrived in
> May -- very possible for cold snap in May, unusual, but not
> unknown. Looks Like PRCo employees as opposed to general public
> and looks like E.Pgh
> .
> The foldout in back of PCC Fought Back indicates that 100 was ordered
> 1936.04.06 and Tens were ordered 1936.07.18 while 100 was still
> Demo. Almost a year to the day after 100 was ordered, the 11's were
> ordered~!~!~!
> .
> --
> *Jim Holland*
>
> Studying *Pittsburgh Railways Company*
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list