[PRCo] Re: 100

Boris Cefer westinghouse at iol.cz
Sun Sep 16 05:50:06 EDT 2007


You understood. But we can hardly judge from what we have.

B

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Holland" <PRCoPCC at P-R-Co.com>
To: "- 1714 PRCo__WP__JTC -" <pittsburgh-railways at lists.dementia.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 9:33 AM
Subject: [PRCo] Re: 100


> .
> Not sure I am understand your question, Mr. B.     Without searching for 
> details, wasn't PRCo 100 pulled from an order already started  --  not 
> unlike both Twin Cities and Detroit getting cars destined for Pgh?     
> Didn't Brooklyn purchase 300 cars, only take delivery of 100 cars, and 
> then broker off the rest?     Didn't PRCo 100 and Boston Queen Mary come 
> from those cars brokered by Brooklyn?     If Yes, then the 1936.04.06 
> order date for PRCo 100 is not unusual.
> .
> Well, for delivery of tens to begin in 1937, they had to be ordered 
> several months earlier, Yes~?~!~?     Make sense  --  how can we 
> judge?     PRCo PCC 100 may have been Demon-Strator  --  In The Sense 
> That  --  *_This_*  Is The New Type of TrolleyCar We Have Ordered for 
> Pgh  *_A~N~D_*  You  Are  Going  To  See  At  Least  100  More  Of  
> These~!~!~!
> 
> *
> Jim Holland*
> 
> Studying *Pittsburgh Railways Company*




More information about the Pittsburgh-railways mailing list