[PRCo] Re: 100
Boris Cefer
westinghouse at iol.cz
Sun Sep 16 05:50:06 EDT 2007
You understood. But we can hardly judge from what we have.
B
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Holland" <PRCoPCC at P-R-Co.com>
To: "- 1714 PRCo__WP__JTC -" <pittsburgh-railways at lists.dementia.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 9:33 AM
Subject: [PRCo] Re: 100
> .
> Not sure I am understand your question, Mr. B. Without searching for
> details, wasn't PRCo 100 pulled from an order already started -- not
> unlike both Twin Cities and Detroit getting cars destined for Pgh?
> Didn't Brooklyn purchase 300 cars, only take delivery of 100 cars, and
> then broker off the rest? Didn't PRCo 100 and Boston Queen Mary come
> from those cars brokered by Brooklyn? If Yes, then the 1936.04.06
> order date for PRCo 100 is not unusual.
> .
> Well, for delivery of tens to begin in 1937, they had to be ordered
> several months earlier, Yes~?~!~? Make sense -- how can we
> judge? PRCo PCC 100 may have been Demon-Strator -- In The Sense
> That -- *_This_* Is The New Type of TrolleyCar We Have Ordered for
> Pgh *_A~N~D_* You Are Going To See At Least 100 More Of
> These~!~!~!
>
> *
> Jim Holland*
>
> Studying *Pittsburgh Railways Company*
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list