[PRCo] Re: Active PCC lines?
fwschneider at comcast.net
fwschneider at comcast.net
Sat Sep 29 23:10:28 EDT 2007
It was either a reliability issue or a perception of trouble in the future. I think the state ordered the change because of their inability to maintain the shunts before the accident actually happened.
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Boris Cefer" <westinghouse at iol.cz>
> But not all of the shunts were broken... Were the signals less reliable or
> they did not work at all?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From:
> To:
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 5:59 PM
> Subject: [PRCo] Re: Active PCC lines?
>
>
> > Phil:
> > When you do not know how to properly torque the mounting bolts or maintain
> > the shunts around the rubber so that the signals will detect cars, you go
> > to solid steel wheels to correct inadequate maintenance practices. Phil
> > Craig could explain the Boston problem ... I recall they were ordered to
> > use solid wheels because cars were not tripping signals because the shunts
> > around the rubber were broken off and not being fixed.
> >
> > As you hinted, it was a matter of incompetence.
> >
> > Fred Schneider
>
>
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list