[PRCo] Re: Philadelphia You-Tube Video

Schneider Fred fwschneider at comcast.net
Fri Dec 26 22:24:16 EST 2008


No it isn't.  Do the math.


On Dec 26, 2008, at 10:08 PM, Phillip Clark Campbell wrote:

>> ----- Original Message ----
>
>> From: Schneider Fred <fwschneider at comcast.net>
>> To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
>> Sent: Friday, December 26, 2008 5:29:47 PM
>> Subject: [PRCo] Philadelphia You-Tube Video
>>
>> The city had 55% more people living within its borders
>> than there are there today and a lot more justification for rail
>> transit as a result.  (The inverse number?   A loss of 35%.)
>
> Isn't that a loss of 45%?
>
>>
>> We can argue that rail will sustain higher patronage
>> levels but we can't argue that rail today would be valid
>> on all the routes...
>>
> This is similar to what has been acknowledged with Pittsburgh
> isn't it.
>
>
> Phil
>
>
>
>
>
>




More information about the Pittsburgh-railways mailing list