[PRCo] Re: Philadelphia You-Tube Video
Bill Robb
bill937ca at yahoo.ca
Sat Dec 27 09:58:25 EST 2008
Does copyright still have to be renewed?
Broadcast rights vary in tv, some are one time only, some are one time and specified number of repeats and at the other extreme some are unlimited. Most video producers are not the original photographer and depending on the terms they acquired access to the footage they may not be the only source.
Bob Dietrich wrote:
It's me again trying to stir up a little controversy. If this has been
discussed lately then just ignore me.
This video on U-tube looked familiar to me but I don't remember from
where, it seems I saw it from a tape. Than at the end credits went to Rob
Moorse (or some such name). So how do we know a retired truck driver from
Belgium (Daddycool9) has permission to let the world view it for free? I
was never aware of, or concerned with, copyrighting until I got on this
list. You all seem very protective of photographs being reproduced without
permission, isn't this the same thing?
Are we promoting unauthorized u-tube videos here?
-----Original Message-----
From: pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org
[mailto:pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org] On Behalf Of
Schneider Fred
Sent: Friday, December 26, 2008 8:30 PM
To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
Subject: [PRCo] Philadelphia You-Tube Video
Many of you probably have seen this before. If not enjoy. All the
scenes were taken in West Philadelphia in 1951.
The city had 55% more people living within its borders than there are
there today and a lot more justification for rail transit as a
result. (The inverse number? A loss of 35%.) A few years after
these films were taken, a massive conversion program brought 1,000
new buses to the city. What the railfans neglect to tell you was
that in the process, over 600 transit vehicles simply disappeared
from the streets of Philadelphia within three years because were no
loner needed ... people moved to the suburbs; those who remained
preferred to use automobiles instead of trolleys. Yes guys, at the
end of the conversion 1000 buses had replaced 1600 buses and
streetcars because of declining demand.
We can argue that rail will sustain higher patronage levels but we
can't argue that rail today would be valid on all the routes that PTC
had in 1950 because the people just don't live there anymore and the
jobs are not there either.
But you'll find these interesting. All were taken within roughly one
mile of Pennsylvania Railroad's 30th Street Station. The pictures
of the street cars and Market Street subway-elevated trains running
side-by-side are at the 24th and Market Streets portal of the
subway. Both came to surface there and crossed the Schuylkill River
on a bridge. The film ends with the trolleys coming inbound out
from under the elevated in front of 30th Street Station and heading
toward the portal. In between there are a lot of surface streetcar
scenes, mostly in the area around the University of Pennsylvania.
Those lines are, for the most part, buried in the subway extension
that occurred in the fall of 1955. (The Market Street subway-
elevated was extended from 24th to 46th St.), the trolley subway was
extended over to branches to 36th St.)
Do you not find amazing how fast PTC motormen ran their charges?
Those were 25 mph cars riding on maximum traction (maximum
derailment) trucks and they were running them for the most part, flat
out. I thought the films might have been speeded up from 16 to 24
frames per second but the pedestrians look to moving at comfortable
paces.
Enjoy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06jIGTbrIUk&feature=related
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list