[PRCo] Re: 3800 Series LOST & streetcar economy etc.
Jerry Matt Matsick
mtoytrain at bellsouth.net
Fri May 9 14:42:26 EDT 2008
Boris - you are saying that Seattle, Portland and Wash Dc have the Tatra T3
in storage: They are nice and are there any others operating in the USA?
--
>From the River City by the Sea!
Jerry "Matt" Matsick
"Jacksonville"
-------------- Original message from "Boris Cefer" <westinghouse at iol.cz>: --------------
> America has purchased several streetcars from CZ, but these are not PCC
> based vehicles. Portland OR, Seattle and Washington DC. Actually, DC has no
> tracks and the three cars they purchased remain in storage in CZ. Why did
> these cities purchased articulated low floor cars? Because the manufacturers
> showed them these and intentionally drove their representatives on these,
> but they did not show them the best of the CZ streetcar fleets - Tatra T3!
>
> When the streetcar economy was mentioned......I know partly how it works and
> guess the rest with which general public is never familiarized. Do not ask
> how the transit works!
>
> B
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Herb Brannon"
> To:
> Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 7:57 PM
> Subject: [PRCo] Re: 3800 Series LOST
>
>
> That was a US based comment. The US transit authorities can buy from other
> countries as long as assembly of the car is here in the US and a certain
> percentage of the parts are US made. It is done with the NABI bus.
> Ironically, NABI stands for North American Bus Industries. Cleveland's 400+
> fleet of NABI low-floors are actually a European product. Some of the parts
> are US manufactured and the bus is assembled in the US. However, some of the
> product is made in Europe and shipped to the US assembly plants to be
> matched up with the the US manufactured parts and then assembled into
> finished buses. Perhaps the European PCC manufacturers did not place bids on
> any cars for US transit authorities. The European manufacturers would have a
> "hard sell" to get US transit authorities to buy their cars, I believe. This
> is do to the mindset, among US transit executives, which says we should have
> over sized cars, utilizing over sized centenary systems and overbuilt
> roadbed. This is not what
> I would propose for a light rail system; it is what the "powers that be"
> dictate. Simplicity of design, in my opinion, creates a more pleasing
> product in the end which is easier to maintain, looks far better, and serves
> it purpose with grace and ease.
>
>
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list