[PRCo] Re: Fw: lancaster_streetcar_ridership_survey.pdf (application/pdf Object)

[Schneider Fred]

I got tired of reading it.   I was one of the people whom they  
accidentally trapped in their phone survey.   If you didn't answer  
the questions with the programmed answers you were told, we don't  
have that answer in our system ... try again.   I told them if they  
didn't have all the possible answers, then some one designed a stupid  
survey.

When they asked me if I would ride it, I told them, hell no.  They  
said, don't you come down town?  Sure I do.   Every week.  And I park  
in front of the store I'm going to.   Get what I want and leave.    
Why should I delay an extra hour to ride the trolley and then pay to  
park too?

On Nov 11, 2008, at 7:53 PM, Ken and Tracie wrote:

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dale Laird" <dale at trams.bc.ca>
> To: <prn-list at sfu.ca>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 4:30 PM
> Subject: lancaster_streetcar_ridership_survey.pdf (application/pdf  
> Object)
>
>
>>
>> Look at page 43.  The PCC ranked low.  I wonder if the respondents
>> actually know what it is like to sit on a wood slat seat vs a  
>> vinyl foam
>> seat?
>>
>> http://www.co.lancaster.pa.us/lancastercity/lib/lancastercity/ 
>> lancaster_streetcar_ridership_survey.pdf
>
>