[PRCo] Re: Anybody Here Know Anything About This?
Joshua Dunfield
joshua.dunfield at gmail.com
Wed Feb 25 19:48:57 EST 2009
2009/2/25 Schneider Fred <fwschneider at comcast.net>:
> Seattle? Vancouver? That may be both volume issues and an
> environmentally conscious city government. Philadelphia running TCs
> there strikes me as lunacy but when you don't know how many people
> are on the vehicle, what does it matter.
Current weekday headways on the 66 are 3 minutes peak, 7 minutes
mid-day. Hard to believe that SEPTA, which hasn't exactly been in
love with trolleybuses, would run it that often without decent
ridership. But I haven't ridden that line; the last trolleybus I rode
in Philly was the 79 (probably in 2002), which has since been
dieselized.
> And Dayton? How can it be economically sound in a city of 155,000
> people that lost 100,000 residents in the last 40 years? Well, if
> you believe GDRTA's numbers, the diesel buses are are taking in 12
> cents per mile in fares and costing 95 cents a mile. The trolleys
> are taking in 82 cents a mile and costing 1.01 a mile to run. But
> there is no route in the system running more often than every 15 to
> 20 minutes and most are 20 to 30 and worse. By thought is that the
> routes the trolleys are on would still take in 82 cents a mile but
> would only cost 95 cents if you didn't have the trackless overhead.
Unless you can build a diesel bus that sounds and performs like a
trolleybus, how can you assume they'd still take in 82 cents a mile?
-j.
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list