[PRCo] Re: Pittsburgh car trucks
Edward H. Lybarger
trams2 at comcast.net
Tue Jul 14 08:24:46 EDT 2009
By themselves, I doubt that they accounted for 2-1/2 tons. But I dunno.
-----Original Message-----
From: pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org
[mailto:pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org] On Behalf Of Mark
McGuire
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 11:45 PM
To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
Subject: [PRCo] Re: Pittsburgh car trucks
Wouldn't the high back seats be considerably heavier than the standard
rataan(sp) seats?
---------- Original Message ----------
From: Schneider Fred <fwschneider at comcast.net>
To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
Subject: [PRCo] Re: Pittsburgh car trucks
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:17:35 -0400
I looked at that too and questioned it. I wondered if the toilet
and the extra partitions weighed more than the seats they replaced?
The larger pinion gears and smaller bull gears would probably be
offsetting so that probably doesn't matter.. We've also added field
weakening coils and contactors but I too have trouble believing that all the
minor modifications added up up 4500 pounds.
My suspicion is that the discrepancy isn't really 4500 but closer to 1800.
Notice, Ed, that the weights of the 5000s, the 5100s and the 5200s are
inconsistent and all four groups of cars (including the 3750s) were multiple
unit cars with the identical control package and couplers.
The 5400s and 5500s came with K control and should have weighed about
the same. The 4800-4939 group were designed to tow trailers and had
K-43 control and the couplers were different. The 4700s were
single door cars with Jones control. I suspect that even though the
list was updated to 1937, the cars were never put on a scale after the 4700s
and 4800s had new front doors added.
On Jul 13, 2009, at 8:50 AM, Edward H. Lybarger wrote:
> What no one has been able to successfully explain to me is why the
> 3750s are listed as being 5000 pounds heavier as essentially identical
> low floor cars in other series. We encountered this discrepancy when
> we were looking at things for 4398 a few years ago.
>
> I do not believe that there was that much difference in the weights.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org
> [mailto:pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org] On Behalf Of
> Schneider Fred
> Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 10:16 PM
> To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
> Subject: [PRCo] Pittsburgh car trucks
>
> Do not know if I ever put this on line before ... might be useful to
> some of you.
> Comes from a Pittsburgh Railways drawing created in 1926 and revised
> in 1935.
>
> Shows car series numbers, trucks, and car weights:
>
> Purfesseur Fred
>
> SERIES TRUCK CAR WEIGHT
>
> 3100 Bemis 48,000
>
> 3400 Bemis 50,000
>
> 3500 St. Louis 58,000
>
> 3600 Baldwin 71,900
>
> 3700 M-26 27" dia. 49,000
>
> 3750 M-25 45,000
>
> 3800 M-27 49,500
>
> 4000 Brill 49-E-2 48,000
>
> 4100 Standard CP-50 48,000
>
> 4200 M-25 40,000
>
> 4250 M-25 40,000
>
> 4300 M-25 40,000
>
> 4350 M-25 41,000
>
> 4400 M-25 40,000
>
> 4700 M-25 38,000
>
> 48-4900 M-25 39,000
>
> 5000 M-25 43,200
>
> 5100 M-25 40,500
>
> 5200 M-25 40,500
>
> 5400 M-25 40,000
>
> 5500 M-25 40,000
>
> B200 M-25 28,000
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________
Turn any room into a work of art. Click now for beautiful oriental rugs!
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2241/fc/BLSrjpYTn24ymbpWJQatfHg8EpbRd
IziNZYaPfF0yJGkSa7mCQUv1nWdO3e/
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list