[PRCo] Re: Pittsburgh car trucks
Schneider Fred
fwschneider at comcast.net
Tue Jul 14 12:06:03 EDT 2009
And a coat of paint adds several hundred pounds of pigment ... except
in the later years in Pittsburgh that all wore off.
On Jul 14, 2009, at 3:44 AM, Mark McGuire wrote:
> Wouldn't the high back seats be considerably heavier than the
> standard rataan(sp) seats?
> ---------- Original Message ----------
> From: Schneider Fred <fwschneider at comcast.net>
> To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
> Subject: [PRCo] Re: Pittsburgh car trucks
> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:17:35 -0400
>
> I looked at that too and questioned it. I wondered if the toilet
> and the extra partitions weighed more than the seats they replaced?
> The larger pinion gears and smaller bull gears would probably be
> offsetting so that probably doesn't matter.. We've also added field
> weakening coils and contactors but I too have trouble believing that
> all the minor modifications added up up 4500 pounds.
>
> My suspicion is that the discrepancy isn't really 4500 but closer to
> 1800.
>
> Notice, Ed, that the weights of the 5000s, the 5100s and the 5200s
> are inconsistent and all four groups of cars (including the 3750s)
> were multiple unit cars with the identical control package and
> couplers.
>
> The 5400s and 5500s came with K control and should have weighed about
> the same. The 4800-4939 group were designed to tow trailers and had
> K-43 control and the couplers were different. The 4700s were
> single door cars with Jones control. I suspect that even though the
> list was updated to 1937, the cars were never put on a scale after
> the 4700s and 4800s had new front doors added.
>
> On Jul 13, 2009, at 8:50 AM, Edward H. Lybarger wrote:
>
>> What no one has been able to successfully explain to me is why the
>> 3750s are
>> listed as being 5000 pounds heavier as essentially identical low
>> floor cars
>> in other series. We encountered this discrepancy when we were
>> looking at
>> things for 4398 a few years ago.
>>
>> I do not believe that there was that much difference in the weights.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org
>> [mailto:pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org] On Behalf Of
>> Schneider Fred
>> Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 10:16 PM
>> To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
>> Subject: [PRCo] Pittsburgh car trucks
>>
>> Do not know if I ever put this on line before ... might be useful
>> to some of
>> you.
>> Comes from a Pittsburgh Railways drawing created in 1926 and
>> revised in
>> 1935.
>>
>> Shows car series numbers, trucks, and car weights:
>>
>> Purfesseur Fred
>>
>> SERIES TRUCK CAR WEIGHT
>>
>> 3100 Bemis 48,000
>>
>> 3400 Bemis 50,000
>>
>> 3500 St. Louis 58,000
>>
>> 3600 Baldwin 71,900
>>
>> 3700 M-26 27" dia. 49,000
>>
>> 3750 M-25 45,000
>>
>> 3800 M-27 49,500
>>
>> 4000 Brill 49-E-2 48,000
>>
>> 4100 Standard CP-50 48,000
>>
>> 4200 M-25 40,000
>>
>> 4250 M-25 40,000
>>
>> 4300 M-25 40,000
>>
>> 4350 M-25 41,000
>>
>> 4400 M-25 40,000
>>
>> 4700 M-25 38,000
>>
>> 48-4900 M-25 39,000
>>
>> 5000 M-25 43,200
>>
>> 5100 M-25 40,500
>>
>> 5200 M-25 40,500
>>
>> 5400 M-25 40,000
>>
>> 5500 M-25 40,000
>>
>> B200 M-25 28,000
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Turn any room into a work of art. Click now for beautiful oriental
> rugs!
> http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2241/fc/
> BLSrjpYTn24ymbpWJQatfHg8EpbRdIziNZYaPfF0yJGkSa7mCQUv1nWdO3e/
>
>
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list