[PRCo] Re: PAT's cuts

[Herb Brannon]

Unfortunately, all that "incredible wealth" is in the hands of 5% of the
population.
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 19:03, John Swindler <j_swindler at hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Subject: [PRCo] Re: PAT's cuts
> > From: fwschneider at comcast.net
> > Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:30:41 -0500
> > To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
> >
> > I have no problem with a certain degree of socialism.   I believe our
> real world needs to fall somewhere between the rich taking as much as they
> can and giving their workers as little as possible and a world in which
> certain things such as child care, medical care, reasonable vacations and
> reasonable minimum wages are available to all who are willing to but in a
> full day (year) of work.
> >
> > I do draw the line at kids like my own who proclaim "I didn't ask to be
> born and therefore you owe me a living."
> >
>
>
> Oh, you mean like my sister???  (:>)
>
> This is an incredibly wealthy country, but you can't give everyone a free
> lunch.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > On Dec 3, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Phillip Clark Campbell wrote:
> >
> > > Just found this  'headline'  which dovetails nicely with
> > > what I write below doesn't it.
> > >
> > > Who Needs Jobs When Wall Street Has the Fed?http://tinyurl.com/2c76wyn
> > >
> > >
> > > Phil
> > > Without  a   'coast'   but  not  a   'cause.'
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Phillip Clark Campbell <pcc_sr at yahoo.com>
> > > To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
> > > Sent: Fri, December 3, 2010 12:42:15 PM
> > > Subject: [PRCo] Re: PAT's cuts
> > >
> > > Mr.Schneider;
> > >
> > > .......  'Socialism'  seems to promote  'mooching;'
> > > why work when someone else shall provide for my basics?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>


-- 
Herb Brannon
In Cuyahoga Valley National Park