[PRCo] Re: West Penn Railways

Edward H. Lybarger trams2 at comcast.net
Tue Feb 9 11:02:48 EST 2010


Ara is not old enough to have shot the Hunker line.  Fact is that we have
only a couple images of that...one from Steve Maguire at County Home Siding
where the sewage plant is today along 119 just south of S Greensburg, and
another dating from 1902-03 at Tarrs. Most of the enthusiasts missed it
entirely.

Ara was not responsible for what was said in the article...such info as he
supplied with the slides was accurate.  It was the author who didn't do his
homework.

-----Original Message-----
From: pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org
[mailto:pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org] On Behalf Of Derrick
Brashear
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 10:49 AM
To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
Subject: [PRCo] Re: West Penn Railways

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Edward H. Lybarger <trams2 at comcast.net>
wrote:
> I've found the article.  Looks like the gent bought some of Ara 
> Mesrobian's seconds and decided they were wonderful.  Bus his 
> knowledge of the system (and Pennsylvania) appears to be limited.

It's a shame he didn't talk to anyone who knew better.

> Those "several" 5' 2-1/2" systems he mentions in the first line would
> include:
>
[about 30 systems...]

> Clearly, his definition of "several" is different from mine.  His 
> understanding of the Coke Region geography is tiny (he missed the 
> existence of the second parallel main line and doesn't grasp that the 
> region encompassed far more than just Connellsville).

Did Ara shoot when the line via New Stanton and south existed?
Or was he extrapolating based on what he had?

> My purpose is not to pick nits here.  But the big thing that's absent 
> is interpretation in its own time.  He's taking what was there in 1951 
> and suggesting that's what it always was.  How egregious.








More information about the Pittsburgh-railways mailing list