[PRCo] Re: Pa PUC Toilet Laws
Schneider Fred
fwschneider at comcast.net
Mon Feb 22 12:06:24 EST 2010
Send an e-mail to EHL.
On Feb 22, 2010, at 12:13 AM, Dwight Long wrote:
> List
>
> Does anyone on this list recall, or have copy of, Pa. PUC
> regulations affecting interurban railways with regard to provision
> of toilet facilities? I seem to recall that they were related
> either to distance, or time in transit, or both.
>
> In particular, I am interested in how they applied, or did not, to
> the PRC interurban lines. Older interurban cars had toilets, PCC
> interurbans did not.
>
> As a subset of this enquiry, I would also like to know how the
> Railways dealt with access to the toilet when the cars were
> operating in city streets. With two man operation this would not
> be a real problem, but when they went to one man operation, it
> seems unlikely that the operator would stop the car and lock the
> door before entering onto the street in the many towns where the
> track was in the street, then stop again at the end of the street
> trackage and unlock the door. Did they just rely on signs saying
> not to flush when on city streets? Obviously these were DOT
> toilets--no Microphors in those days!
>
> Any thoughts or facts on these questions will be appreciated!
>
> Dwight Long
>
>
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list