[PRCo] Re: Pa PUC Toilet Laws

Schneider Fred fwschneider at comcast.net
Mon Feb 22 12:06:24 EST 2010


Send an e-mail to EHL.


On Feb 22, 2010, at 12:13 AM, Dwight Long wrote:

> List
>
> Does anyone on this list recall, or have copy of, Pa. PUC  
> regulations affecting interurban railways with regard to provision  
> of toilet facilities?  I seem to recall that they were related  
> either to distance, or time in transit, or both.
>
> In particular, I am interested in how they applied, or did not, to  
> the PRC interurban lines. Older interurban cars had toilets, PCC  
> interurbans did not.
>
> As a subset of this enquiry, I would also like to know how the  
> Railways dealt with access to the toilet when the cars were  
> operating in city streets.  With two man operation this would not  
> be a real problem, but when they went to one man operation, it  
> seems unlikely that the operator would stop the car and lock the  
> door before entering onto the street in the many towns where the  
> track was in the street, then stop again at the end of the street  
> trackage and unlock the door.  Did they just rely on signs saying  
> not to flush when on city streets?  Obviously these were DOT  
> toilets--no Microphors in those days!
>
> Any thoughts or facts on these questions will be appreciated!
>
> Dwight Long
>
>




More information about the Pittsburgh-railways mailing list