[PRCo] Re: Johnstown 362
John Swindler
j_swindler at hotmail.com
Sun Jul 11 10:42:25 EDT 2010
I had a couple accidents my first summer with the CTA, but they involved someone hitting rear of bus. No accidents my second summer.
> From: ktjosephson at embarqmail.com
> To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
> Subject: [PRCo] Re: Johnstown 362
> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 07:16:41 -0700
>
> The private company contracted to run the local bus system in Las Vegas used
> to fire drivers after their first accident, so they could get a break on
> their insurance by claiming their work force was entirely accident free.
>
> The turnover was so frequent, they revised their policy. Now they fire
> drivers for their first CHARGEABLE accident.
>
> Three hard braking applications during one's driving career will also get a
> driver terminated.
>
> All this for $10 per hour in a city where red light running and using
> turning lanes as passing lanes is the rule rather than the exception.
>
> The transit system's management team also complains to the local media they
> cannot keep enough drivers to fill schedules and has made overtime
> mandatory.
>
> K.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Fred Schneider" <fwschneider at comcast.net>
> To: <pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org>
> Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 5:45 AM
> Subject: [PRCo] Re: Johnstown 362
>
>
> > Except for one of the newest PAT bus drivers who writes the PAT column for
> > the museum ...
> >
> > Chris was able to get a job driving a bus for PAT this year when he got
> > his college degree but he wasn't able to get a broadcasting job. Sad.
> >
> >
> > On Jul 10, 2010, at 10:49 PM, John Swindler wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Suspected the damage to 362 occurred in Illinois. It was stored outside
> >> at RTY among several unused cars, so chances of an accident were
> >> minimal. But stored in a carbarn in Illinois with cars entering and
> >> exiting - much higher likelihood of an accident.
> >>
> >> The difference between a trolley museum and a transit system is that a
> >> transit system has multiple routes and only one or a few trolley (or bus)
> >> models, while a museum has only one route to learn, but every car can be
> >> different. And as you know, I'm familiar with both situations.
> >>
> >> There is also the part time nature of a trolley museum. Transit service
> >> is a full time job, which means 5-6 days per week. You don't forget
> >> things day to day. But trolley museums are part time endeavors, which
> >> means it can be a short term memory test - at least for first trip.
> >> That's why I like to use weekdays for 'refresher' training when things
> >> can be much less hectic.
> >>
> >>
> >> Speaking of hectic, there is a stress with schedule adherence on a
> >> transit system. We don't operate a 90 second headway at PTM as was the
> >> case with the 36 Broadway rush hour many years ago. That is, at PTM, we
> >> don't have to take the "chances" in traffic that happens daily on a
> >> transit system. We can be more concerned with safety crossing Main St.
> >> because a tight schedule is not a consideration.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On transit systems, accidents happen. I see this from the rail safety
> >> work. But a museum can truly strive for zero accidents.
> >>
> >>
> >> But as you mentioned, most operators come to museums later in life. We
> >> are not as "agile" as in earlier years. Have to be careful of knees,
> >> ankles, back, etc. These were not concerns in my younger years with the
> >> CTA, nor your Strasburg days.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> And as for younger transit operators grasping concepts better then at
> >> museums, I would not bet on it. Museums are going to attract a much
> >> higher educational level then the typical transit system new employee.
> >> Even in today's economy it is difficult to find good transit employees.
> >> Many applicants are "weeded out", either in pre-employment or initial
> >> training. (from a large transit system manager this end of the state -
> >> said they are still scrapping the bottom of the barrel for employees)
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> From: fwschneider at comcast.net
> >>> Subject: [PRCo] Re: Johnstown 362
> >>> Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:26:16 -0400
> >>> To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
> >>>
> >>> And Dave Hamley explained that the accident damage happened at the
> >>> museum in Illinois.
> >>> Museums have several problems that probably result in a much high
> >>> accident ratio than the street railway industry as a whole had ... just
> >>> my hunch with no statistics to back it up. Museums really don't have
> >>> good accident per mile stats to compare with the transit industry as a
> >>> whole. But we do know that a streetcar probably ran 30,000 miles a year
> >>> in public service and an operator worked about 18,000 miles. Interurban
> >>> cars? I suspect a car on the Indiana Railroad or the C&LE might have
> >>> easily run up several hundred thousand miles in a year. I remember Jim
> >>> Shuman telling me of seeing a trainman in the morning about to leave
> >>> Indianpolis for Louisville and then seeing the same man later that day
> >>> getting on a car to pilot it on his second round trip of the day to
> >>> Louisville. That would be about 480 miles of running in one day! In the
> >>> depression he had to be glad just to have the job. If you multiply that
> >>> out to a full year, that is 149,760 miles of twirling a con!
> >>> troller if he was forced to work 6 days a week with no vacations and no
> >>> holidays.
> >>>
> >>> 1. Most museum operators work a few hundred miles a year or fewer. If
> >>> you want to get good, you need to work 18,000 miles a year.
> >>>
> >>> 2. Most museum operators suffer with all sorts of control and brake
> >>> schemes. Even though I've never seen a drum controller that didn't wind
> >>> up clockwise and wide off counterclockwise, you surely get confused when
> >>> get something like an old K-8 at the Baltimore Streetcar Museum where
> >>> the off position is at 4 o'clock instead of 1'oclock and the full
> >>> parallel position is where your mind instinctively tells you the off
> >>> position should be. If you were working for Pittsburgh Railways, you
> >>> would have had PCCs of one or two classes (and they behaved pretty much
> >>> the same) and perhaps high speed yellow cars with the same controller
> >>> and brake valve. You couldn't get confused.
> >>>
> >>> Between the museums I work, I have K8, K35, K36, K63, PCM, PC, type M,
> >>> HL which is really type M because that's what Pittsburgh wanted. I've
> >>> also run foot operated type PCM and hand VA and some other weird schemes
> >>> like the Cineston on a Muni Bandit at Western. Even PK at Branford.
> >>>
> >>> Even worse are the variety of brake schemes in museums. If you work at
> >>> PTM you will be confronted with self-lapping straight air, manually
> >>> lapped straight air (and with a variety of valves to the same thing but
> >>> designed to confuse), and PCCs with air (1183) or all-electric. But I
> >>> also work in Baltimore, so add one more type of self-lapping straight
> >>> air and cars with hand brakes. I've also worked cars with dynamic
> >>> braking drum controllers at National Capital (it might have been their
> >>> Linz, Austria car) and a London double decker at Crich ... these are all
> >>> similar to West Penn Railways had. I also had two years on the payroll
> >>> in engine service and almost eight more years as a brakeman at the
> >>> Strasburg Rail Road so I do understand automatic air ... I've run steam
> >>> engines, an MU car for 35 miles on the Pennsy mainline, a CA&E car at
> >>> RTY and a PE Blimp at Orange Empire, all with automatic air.
> >>>
> >>> 3. Today most of our museum operators come to us in their 40s, 50s, 60s.
> >>> It's a lot easier to train a man or woman to run a vehicle when they are
> >>> 16, 17, 18 maybe even 25 than it is when they are 65. They grasp
> >>> concepts a lot more readily and retain them longer and better when
> >>> they're young.
> >>>
> >>> I'm really surprised that we don't have more accidents in our museums.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Jul 8, 2010, at 9:03 PM, John Swindler wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Perhaps getting some cars from Trolleyville that once operated in the
> >>>> Chicago area had something to do with the storage space issue.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> At one time car 362 was at RTY.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> From: fwschneider at comcast.net
> >>>>> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 14:57:05 -0400
> >>>>> Subject: [PRCo] Johnstown 362
> >>>>> To: Pittsburgh-Railways at Dementia.Org
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Scott Becker got his name in the Johnstown Tribune Democrat yesterday.
> >>>>> Seems the guys out at the Fox River Trolley Museum (Illinois) did not
> >>>>> have enough storage space for their former Johnstown car. Becker found
> >>>>> a home for it back in Cambria County. The links below lead to the
> >>>>> story in the local papers.
> >>>>> Thanks to Ed Havens of Tucson, Arizona who forwarded the links to
> >>>>> Frank Pfuhler in Brooklyn who passed it my way. Ed is an old
> >>>>> Philadelphia fan.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://tribune-democrat.com/local/x279770942/84-year-old-streetcar-returns-to-Johnstown
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://tinyurl.com/2wz5kvg
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _________________________________________________________________
> >>>> The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars
> >>>> with Hotmail.
> >>>> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendar&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _________________________________________________________________
> >> The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with
> >> Hotmail.
> >> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendar&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multiaccount&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list