[PRCo] Re: Washington Interurban Forensics
Dwight Long
dwightlong at verizon.net
Wed Dec 7 18:13:12 EST 2011
Bob
I doubt this picture was taken on the Washington interurban line at all.
I believe all sidings on that line which were open track sidings were
protected by USS track/impedance bond signals. This photo shows a Nachod
signal OHL contactor, which suggests to me that it was not on the
Washington line. Could this possibly be on 38A?
Dwight
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Iannucci" <bob at rail.com>
To: <pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 1:09 PM
Subject: [PRCo] Washington Interurban Forensics
> Phillip Clark Campbell wrote:
>> In the archives is a picture of an old car that no one on this list can
>> identify isn't there. It is reportedly on the Interurban lines. A PCC
>> was
>> also photographed at the same location. It is tedious trying to find the
>> photo in the archives. This looks like the photo in the archives,
>> again, location unidentified by anyone:
>> http://www.davesrailpix.com/pitts/htm/wvp009.htm
>>
>
> This is a really intriguing picture - I had never seen it before. The lay
> of the roadbed behind the car, the direction of the track, and the
> location
> of the poles match a location in Upper St. Clair, just southwest of the
> former Drake Trestle. The area is now called Wiltshire Park. Analysis
> of
> old maps shows that a walking path in that park was once part of the
> roadbed of the former Washington Interurban line. On my trip to
> Pittsburgh
> this summer, I shot photos of that area. The poles are long gone, but
> there is still pretty clear evidence of them on the right hand side
> (relative to the direction in which the car in the picture is traveling)
> of
> the former roadbed. The widening of the walking path in that area now
> corresponds to the passing siding we see in the picture from the 1940's.
> Can anyone say if there was a passing siding just southwest of the
> Trestle? The area is overgrown now, but when I was growing up in Upper
> St.
> Clair in the 1960's, this area was just brush as in the 1940's photo.
>
> I've made up the attached for your review - to give you some context and
> to
> invite analysis of these two pictures. Were they shot at the same
> location? At present, the evidence is somewhat thin. Any information to
> prove or disprove this will be appreciated.
>
> If anyone can find the picture of the PCC taken at the same location (as
> mentioned above), I'd really appreciate it. Also, I am looking for *any*
> photos of the former Washington interurban line in the area from Drake to
> the southwest edge of Upper St. Clair.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Bob
>
>
>
> -- Attached file removed by Ecartis and put at URL below --
> -- Type: application/pdf
> -- Size: 2069k (2119165 bytes)
> -- URL :
> http://lists.dementix.org/files/pittsburgh-railways/Interurban%20Forensics.pdf
>
>
>
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list